The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, RussiaBeck, James M. (James Montgomery)
Philosophy
The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, Russia
Beck, James M. (James Montgomery)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
On the other hand I by no means overlook the difficulty
encountered by You and Your Government to stem the tide of
public opinion. In view of the cordial friendship which has
joined us both for a long time with firm ties, I shall use
my entire influence to induce Austria-Hungary to obtain a
frank and satisfactory understanding with Russia. I hope
confidently that You will support me in my efforts to
overcome all difficulties which may yet arise.[60]
[Footnote 60: German _White Paper_, No. 20. The Capitals to the
pronouns follow the original correspondence.]
This telegram rings true, and fairly suggests a pacific attitude on
the part of the Kaiser when he first took the helm on his return from
Norway. Its weakness lies in the fact that the record, as presented by
the German Government, does not disclose any communication which he
sent to his Austrian ally in the interests of peace. We have the
frequent assurances of the Kaiser to the Czar that he was exerting
all his influence to induce his ally to come to a satisfactory
understanding with Russia, _but neither over the signature of the
Kaiser nor over that of his Foreign Minister does the record show a
single communication addressed to Vienna in the interests of peace_.
The Czar did not fail to appreciate this, and his reply to the Kaiser
rings quite as true and suggests the crux of the whole problem. It
reads:
I am glad that You are back in Germany. In this serious
moment I ask You earnestly to help me. An ignominious war
has been declared against a weak country, and in Russia the
indignation, which I fully share, is tremendous. I fear that
very soon I shall be unable to resist the pressure exercised
upon me and that I shall be forced to take measures which
will lead to war. To prevent such a calamity as a European
war would be, I urge You in the name of our old friendship
to do all in Your power _to restrain Your ally from going
too far_.[61]
[Footnote 61: German _White Paper_, No. 21.]
Who can deny the force of the sentence thus italicized? It was Austria
which was the provocative factor. It was then bombarding Belgrade and
endeavoring to cross the Danube into Servia. It had declared war, and
brusquely refused even to discuss the question with Russia. It was
mobilizing its army, and making every effort to make a speedy
subjugation of Servia. If peace was to be preserved, the pressure must
begin with Austria. If any question remained for peace parleys, the
_status quo_ must be preserved. Russia could not permit Austria to
destroy Servia first and then discuss its justice.
Thereupon the Kaiser telegraphed the Czar as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account