The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, RussiaBeck, James M. (James Montgomery)
Philosophy
The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, Russia
Beck, James M. (James Montgomery)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
I have received Your telegram and I share Your desire for
the conservation of peace. However I cannot--as I told You
in my first telegram--consider the action of Austria-Hungary
as an "ignominious war." Austria-Hungary knows from
experience that the promises of Servia as long as they are
merely on paper are entirely unreliable.
According to my opinion the action of Austria-Hungary is to
be considered as an attempt to receive full guaranty that
the promises of Servia are effectively translated into
deeds. In this opinion I am strengthened by the explanation
of the Austrian Cabinet that Austria-Hungary intended no
territorial gain at the expense of Servia. I am therefore
of opinion that it is perfectly possible for Russia to
remain a spectator in the Austro-Servian war without drawing
Europe into the most terrible war it has ever seen. I
believe that a direct understanding is possible and
desirable between Your Government and Vienna, an
understanding which--as I have already telegraphed You--my
Government endeavors to aid with all possible effort.
Naturally military measures by Russia, which might be
construed as a menace by Austria-Hungary, would accelerate a
calamity which both of us desire to avoid and would
undermine my position as mediator which--upon Your appeal to
my friendship and aid--I willingly accepted.[62]
[Footnote 62: German _White Paper_, No. 22. See note, _post._, p.
189.]
The Kaiser's fatal error lies in the concluding paragraph of this
telegram, in claiming that Russia should not take any military
measures pending the Kaiser's mediation, _although Austria should be
left free not merely to make such preparations against Russia, but to
pursue its aggressive war then already commenced against Servia_. If
the belligerents were expected to desist from military preparations,
should not the obligation be reciprocal?
Later that night the Kaiser again telegraphed the Czar:
My Ambassador has instructions to direct the attention of
Your Government to the dangers and serious consequences of a
mobilization; I have told You the same in my last telegram.
Austria-Hungary has mobilized only against Servia, and only
a part of her army. If Russia, as seems to be the case
according to Your advice and that of Your Government,
mobilizes against Austria-Hungary, the part of the mediator,
with which You have entrusted me in such friendly manner
and which I have accepted upon Your express desire, is
threatened if not made impossible. The entire weight of
decision now rests upon Your shoulders. You have to bear the
responsibility for war or peace.[63]
[Footnote 63: German _White Paper_, No. 23.]
To which the Czar replied as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account