The evolution of climateBrooks, C. E. P. (Charles Ernest Pelham)
Science
The evolution of climate
Brooks, C. E. P. (Charles Ernest Pelham)
Climatology; Paleoclimatology
The fourfold glaciation has been recognized with certainty only
in Europe and North America, and even in these countries there is
considerable doubt whether the northern ice-sheets shrank back as
far as their present narrow limits during the interglacial periods.
The long Mindel-Riss interglacial, which was probably the Chellean
stage of flint industry,[3] was characterized by a very warmth-loving
fauna, and it is possible, even probable, that during this period the
glaciers melted completely away, except on the very highest summits.
Of the climate of the Gunz-Mindel interglacial (termed by J. Geikie
the “Norfolkian,” from the Cromer Forest Bed), we have comparatively
little evidence. If the suggestion put forward in the following
chapter is correct, the Gunz-Mindel interglacial was merely a local
incident in the glaciation of the Alps, and not a true interglacial
at all. Even the Cromer Forest Bed itself is not conclusive, since it
is a river deposit largely composed of material drifted from lower
latitudes. The Riss-Wurm interglacial (J. Geikie’s “Neudeckian”)
nowhere gives us evidence of a climate as warm as the present, and as
regards the Scandinavian and Canadian ice-sheets may have been merely
an extensive and prolonged oscillation of the ice-edge.
As regards the glaciation of Norway, the question has been
investigated recently by H. W. son Ahlmann, who has published a long
and detailed paper in English in volumes 1 and 2 of the Swedish
_Geographiska Annalen_. He concludes that the morphology of Norway,
without reference to stratigraphical or biological data, gives
conclusive evidence of two glaciations. The first of these was the
greater, and between that time and the second smaller glaciations
there occurred an interglacial period of such considerable length
that the greater part of the present gorges was then formed by
fluvial erosion.
We may, accordingly, consider the Ice Age as fourfold or double,
according to the point of view from which we regard it. In the Alps
and other mountain ranges on the borders of the great northern
ice-sheets, which respond very readily to small changes, it was
fourfold. In the peripheral regions of the northern ice-sheets
themselves it has an appearance of being threefold or fourfold. In
the more central regions of these great ice-sheets, where response
to climatic change is very slow, there is no evidence of more than
two glaciations; but in these regions, where the destructive effect
of the ice reached its maximum, it is only by the merest chance that
evidence of interglacial periods is preserved at all. And finally, in
all other parts of the world we have evidence of only two glaciations
at most.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account