The evolution of general ideasRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The evolution of general ideas
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Abstraction; Imagination
The peculiar feature of this period, in its lowest degrees, is that
the notion of time cannot as yet be separated, or extracted, from the
sequence of events. We have already given many examples of this state of
intelligence. It is not poetical feeling that makes the savage reckon
the age of his children by the flowering of certain plants (and other
analogous locutions abound among primitive races,)—nor any innate taste
for metaphor: it is merely that he requires concrete marks to determine
duration. He cannot think the longer periods _in abstracto_; they must
be imagined, represented in virtue of a more or less arbitrary choice,
imprisoned in a concrete mould. Moreover, in the absence of any extended,
coherent, systematic numeration, the mind loses itself after the first
step. It lacks the necessary vehicle for movement in front and behind,
knowing whither it is tending. The natural phenomena which it takes as
its starting-point are poor substitutes for the absent sign, and moreover
rivet it invincibly to the concrete.
In my opinion, the culminating point of this period is arrived at in the
popular conception of time—considered as a vague entity which unrolls
itself, as it gives birth to events. This is the notion that is general
among most men of medium culture, who are ignorant of philosophical
speculation on the subject. It is the final term of common, spontaneous
reflexion, left to its own resources. Thus it is said of time that it
brings the unexpected, consoles sorrow, extinguishes passion, changes
tastes, solves difficulties, and the like; it seems to be an active
power, a thing in itself. In fact, no other abstraction has perhaps
been so often reified. We may further remark that time has often been
personified and even deified in several religions. Such an honor has
never been conceded to space. The cause of this difference is that time
has an internal, human character: above all, that it is opposed to
space as dynamic to static. It is an entity manifested in movement and
change, and thereby essentially acting and living. While, in the popular
conception, space is the _passive_ receptacle of bodies, time is the
_active_ spring by which the whole is set in motion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account