The evolution of general ideasRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The evolution of general ideas
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Abstraction; Imagination
Are there animals capable of counting? G. Leroy is, I believe, the first
who answered this question in the affirmative, in a passage which is
worth transcribing, although it has been often quoted. “Among the various
ideas which necessity adds to the experience of animals, that of number
must not be overlooked. Animals count,—so much is certain; and although
up to the present time their arithmetic appears weak, it may perhaps be
possible to strengthen it. In countries where game is preserved, war is
made upon magpies because they steal the eggs of other birds.... And
in order to destroy this greedy family at a blow, game-keepers seek to
destroy the mother while sitting. To do this it is necessary to build
a well-screened watch-house at the foot of the tree where the nests
are, and in this a man is stationed to await the return of the parent
bird, but he will wait in vain if the bird has been shot at under the
same circumstances before.... To deceive this suspicious bird, the
plan was hit upon of sending two men into the watch-house, one of them
passed on while the other remained; but the magpie counted and kept her
distance. The next day three went, and again she perceived that only
two withdrew. It was eventually found necessary to send five or six men
to the watch-house in order to put her out of her calculation.... This
phenomenon, which is repeated as many times as the attempt is made, is
one of the most extraordinary instances of the sagacity of animals.”
Since then the question has been repeatedly taken up. Lubbock devotes to
it the three last pages of his book _The Senses of Animals_. According
to his observations on the nests of birds, one egg may be taken from
a nest in which there are four, but if we take away two, the bird
generally deserts its nest. The solitary wasp provisions its cell with
a fixed number of victims. Sand wasps are content with one. One species
of _Eumenes_ prepares five victims for its young, another species ten,
another fifteen, another twenty-four; but the number of the victims
is always the same for the same species. How does the insect know its
characteristic number?[16]
An experiment, methodically conducted by Romanes, proved that a
chimpanzee can count correctly as far as five, distinguishing the words
which stand for one, two, three, four, five, and at command deliver the
number of straws requested of her.[17]
Although the observations on this point are not yet sufficiently varied
and extended to enable us to speak of them as we should wish, it must
be remarked that the cases cited are not alike, and that it would be
illegitimate to reduce them all to one and the same psychological
mechanism.
1. The case of insects is the most embarrassing. It is but candid
to state a _non liquet_, since to attribute their achievements to
unconscious numeration, or to some special equivalent instinct, is
tantamount to saying nothing. Besides, we are not concerned with anything
relating to instinct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account