The evolution of general ideasRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The evolution of general ideas
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Abstraction; Imagination
With regard to ants, we learn from such observers as Kirby and Spence,
Huber, Franklin, that they employ a system of signs. To elucidate this
point, Lubbock undertook a series of patient experiments, certain of
which may be quoted.[42] He pinned down a dead fly so that no ant could
carry it off. The first that came made vain attempts to remove it. It
then went to the ant-hill and brought seven others to the rescue, but
hurried imprudently in front of them. “Seemingly only half awake,”
they lost the track and wandered alone for twenty minutes. The first
returned to the nest and brought back eight, who, so soon as they were
left behind by the guide, turned back again. During this time the band
of seven (or at least some of them) had discovered the fly, which they
tore in pieces and carried off to the nest. The experiment was several
times repeated, with different species, and always with the same result.
Lubbock concluded that ants were able to communicate their discoveries,
but without indicating locality. In another experiment he placed three
glasses at a distance of thirty inches from a nest of ants. One of the
glasses contained two or three larvæ, the second three hundred to six
hundred, the third none at all. He connected the nest with the glasses
by means of three parallel tapes, and placed one ant in the glass with
many larvæ and another ant in that with two or three. Each of them took a
larva and carried it to the nest, returning for another, and so on. After
each journey he put another larva into the glass with only two or three
larvæ, to replace that which had been removed, and every stranger brought
was imprisoned until the end of the experiment. Were the number of visits
to all three glasses the same? And if not, which of the two glasses
containing larvæ received the greater number of visitors? A difference
in number would seem to be conclusive as proving power of communication.
The result was that during forty-seven and a half hours two hundred
and fifty-seven friends were brought by the ants having access to the
glass containing numerous larvæ, while during an interval of fifty-three
hours there were only eighty strange visitors to the glass containing
two or three larvæ; there were no visits to the glass containing none.
Communication for bees as for ants, appears to be made by rubbing the
antennæ. If the queen is carried off in a hive, some of the bees are
sure to discover it before long. They become greatly agitated, and run
about the hive frantically, touching any companions they meet with their
crossed antennæ, and thus spreading the news through the whole community.
The bee-hunters in America discover them by choosing a clearing where
they catch a few wandering bees, which are then gorged with honey and
suffered to fly when replete. These bees return with a numerous escort.
The same process is repeated with the new comers, and by observing the
direction which they follow at their departure, the nest is discovered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account