Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
It will be the task of some future physiologist to engage in the study
of the evolution of functions with the same zeal and success as has
been done for the evolution of structures in morphogeny (the science of
the genesis of forms). Let me illustrate the close connection of the
two by a couple of examples. The heart in the human embryo has at first
a very simple construction, such as we find in permanent form among the
ascidiæ and other low organisms; with this is associated a very simple
system of circulation of the blood. Now, when we find that with the
full-grown heart there comes a totally different and much more
intricate circulation, our inquiry into the development of the heart
becomes at once, not only an anatomical, but also a physiological,
study. Thus it is clear that the ontogeny of the heart can only be
understood in the light of its phylogeny (or development in the past),
both as regards function and structure. The same holds true of all the
other organs and their functions. For instance, the science of the
evolution of the alimentary canal, the lungs, or the sexual organs,
gives us at the same time, through the exact comparative investigation
of structure-development, most important information with regard to the
evolution of the functions of these organs.
This significant connection is very clearly seen in the evolution of
the nervous system. This system is in the economy of the human body the
medium of sensation, will, and even thought, the highest of the psychic
functions; in a word, of all the various functions which constitute the
proper object of psychology. Modern anatomy and physiology have proved
that these psychic functions are immediately dependent on the fine
structure and the composition of the central nervous system, or the
internal texture of the brain and spinal cord. In these we find the
elaborate cell-machinery, of which the psychic or soul-life is the
physiological function. It is so intricate that most men still look
upon the mind as something supernatural that cannot be explained on
mechanical principles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account