Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
physiological pontiff, and attacked the theory of epigenesis as a
dangerous innovation. It was not until more than fifty years afterwards
that Wolff’s work was appreciated. Only when Meckel translated into
German in 1812 another valuable work of Wolff’s on _The Formation of
the Alimentary Canal_ (written in 1768), and called attention to its
great importance, did people begin to think of him once more; yet this
obscure writer had evinced a profounder insight into the nature of the
living organism than any other scientist of the eighteenth century.
Wolff’s idea led to an appreciable advance over the whole field of
biology. There is such a vast number of new and important observations
and pregnant thoughts in his writings that we have only gradually
learned to appreciate them rightly in the course of the nineteenth
century. He opened up the true path for research in many directions. In
the first place, his theory of epigenesis gave us our first real
insight into the nature of embryonic development. He showed
convincingly that the development of every organism consists of a
series of _new formations,_ and that there is no trace whatever of the
complete form either in the ovum or the spermatozoon. On the contrary,
these are quite simple bodies, with a very different purport. The
embryo which is developed from them is also quite different, in its
internal arrangement and outer configuration, from the complete
organism. There is no trace whatever of preformation or in-folding of
organs. To-day we can scarcely call epigenesis a _theory,_ because we
are convinced it is a fact, and can demonstrate it at any moment with
the aid of the microscope.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account