Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
The many new points of view and fresh ideas suggested by my gastræa
theory and Hertwig’s cœlom theory led to the publication of a number of
writings on the theory of germinal layers. Most of them set out to
oppose it at first, but in the end the majority supported it. Of late
years both theories are accepted in their essential features by nearly
every competent man of science, and light and order have been
introduced into this once dark and contradictory field of research. A
further cause of congratulation for this solution of the great
embryological controversy is that it brought with it a recognition of
the need for phylogenetic study and explanation.
Interest and practice in embryological research have been remarkably
stimulated during the past thirty years by this appreciation of
phylogenetic methods. Hundreds of assiduous and able observers are now
engaged in the development of comparative embryology and its
establishment on a basis of evolution, whereas they numbered only a few
dozen not many decades ago. It would take too long to enumerate even
the most important of the countless valuable works which have enriched
embryological literature since that time. References to them will be
found in the latest manuals of embryology of Kölliker, Balfour,
Hertwig, Kollman, Korschelt, and Heider.
Kölliker’s _Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen und der höherer
Thiere,_ the first edition of which appeared forty-two years ago, had
the rare merit at that time of gathering into presentable form the
scattered attainments of the science, and expounding them in some sort
of unity on the basis of the cellular theory and the theory of germinal
layers. Unfortunately, the distinguished Würtzburg anatomist, to whom
comparative anatomy, histology, and ontogeny owe so much, is opposed to
the theory of descent generally and to Darwinism in particular. All the
other manuals I have mentioned take a decided stand on evolution.
Francis Balfour has carefully collected and presented with
discrimination, in his _Manual of Comparative Embryology_ (1880), the
very scattered and extensive literature of the subject; he has also
widened the basis of the gastræa theory by a comparative description of
the rise of the organs from the germinal layers in all the chief groups
of the animal kingdom, and has given a most thorough empirical support
to the principles I have formulated. A comparison of his work with the
excellent _Text-book of the Embryology of the Vertebrates_ (1890)
[translation 1895] of Korschelt and Heider shows what astonishing
progress has been made in the science in the course of ten years. I
would especially recommend the manuals of Julius Kollmann and Oscar
Hertwig to those readers who are stimulated to further study by these
chapters on human embryology. Kollmann’s work is commendable for its
clear treatment of the subject and very fine original illustrations;
its author adheres firmly to the biogenetic law, and uses it throughout
with considerable profit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account