Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
Now, let us for the first time make use of our biogenetic law; and
directly apply this fundamental law of evolution to the human ovum. We
reach a very simple, but very important, conclusion. _ From_
_the fact that the human ovum and that of all other animals consists of
a single cell, it follows immediately, according to the biogenetic law,
that all the animals, including man, descend from a unicellular
organism._ If our biogenetic law is true, if the embryonic development
is a summary or condensed recapitulation of the stem-history—and there
can be no doubt about it—we are bound to conclude, from the fact that
all the ova are at first simple cells, that all the multicellular
organisms originally sprang from a unicellular being. And as the
original ovum in man and all the other animals has the same simple and
indefinite appearance, we may assume with some probability that this
unicellular stem-form was the common ancestor of the whole animal
world, including man. However, this last hypothesis does not seem to me
as inevitable and as absolutely certain as our first conclusion.
Fig.15 A fertilised ovum from the oviduct of a hen Fig. 15—A fertilised
ovum from the oviduct of a hen. The yellow yelk (_c_) consists of
several concentric layers (_d_), and is enclosed in a thin
yelk-membrane (_a_). The nucleus or germinal vesicle is seen above in
the cicatrix or “tread” (_b_). From that point the white yelk
penetrates to the central yelk-cavity (_d′_). The two kinds of yelk do
not differ very much.
This inference from the unicellular embryonic form to the unicellular
ancestor is so simple, but so important, that we cannot sufficiently
emphasise it. We must, therefore, turn next to the question whether
there are to-day any unicellular organisms, from the features of which
we may draw some approximate conclusion as to the unicellular ancestors
of the multicellular organisms. The answer is: Most certainly there
are. There are assuredly still unicellular organisms which are, in
their whole nature, really nothing more than permanent ova. There are
independent unicellular organisms of the simplest character which
develop no further, but reproduce themselves as such, without any
further growth. We know to-day of a great number of these little
beings, such as the gregarinæ, flagellata, acineta, infusoria, etc.
However, there is one of them that has an especial interest for us,
because it at once suggests itself when we raise our question, and it
must be regarded as the unicellular being that approaches nearest to
the real ancestral form. This organism is the _Amœba._
Fig.16 A creeping amœba. Fig. 16—A creeping amœba (highly magnified).
The whole organism is a simple naked cell, and moves about by means of
the changing arms which it thrusts out of and withdraws into its
protoplasmic body. Inside it is the roundish nucleus with its
nucleolus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account