The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments — John Shaqi
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
But the evolutionists are clinging to the radio-activity theory
desperately, an S.O.S. of a lost cause, depending, like evolution, on a
great many assumptions, and unproven hypotheses. The assumption is that
a radio-active substance, like uranium, “decays,” or passes into many
other substances, of which radium is one, finally producing lead in
1,000,000,000 years or more. From this theory, Prof. Russell concludes
that the earth is 4,000,000,000 to 8,000,000,000 years old, and the sun
is older still. During this inconceivably long period, the sun was
giving out as much heat as at present, which is 2,200,000,000 times as
much as the earth receives. The heat of the sun can not be accounted
for, by either the combustion or cooling off theory. By the commonly
accepted contraction theory, the heat has been maintained only about
20,000,000 years. How could it have been sustained 4,000,000,000 to
8,000,000,000 years? Prof. Russell answers: “We must therefore
_suppose_ that energy from an ‘unknown source’ becomes available at
exceedingly high temperatures.... We can not do more than _guess_ where
it is hidden.” Is this scientific? This theory, moreover, is
interlocked with Einstein’s theory of Relativity, which holds that all
energy has mass, and all mass is equivalent to energy. Although 2700
books have been written, pro and con, upon Einstein’s theory, yet he
says only 12 men understand it, and a scientist retorts that Einstein
can not be one of the 12. The contraction theory, the thickness of the
cooled crust of the earth, and the conformation of its surface, all
give mathematical proof that evolution is impossible because of lack of
time.
11. GEOLOGY AND HISTORY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account