The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments — John Shaqi
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
Part One
The Evolution of the Human Body Mathematically Disproved
Any scientific theory or hypothesis must be proved first possible, then
probable, then certain. To be a possible theory, it must be
reconcilable with many facts; to be a probable theory, it must be
reconcilable with many more; to be a certain and proven theory, it must
be reconcilable with _all_ the facts. Whenever it is irreconcilable
with _any_ fact, it should be rejected, as it can not be a true theory.
Every true theory passes through these three stages,—possibility,
probability, and certainty. A theory is not science, until it is
certainly true, and so becomes knowledge. The evolution of man from the
brute is in the throes of a desperate struggle to show that it may
possibly be a true theory or hypothesis. Yet some who are ready to
admit that they are “scientists,” claim evolution a proven theory.
If it can be shown possible for man to have descended or ascended from
the lower animals, it will require enormous additional evidence to show
that such descent is probable; and still much more to make it certain.
Every scientific theory, proposed as _possible_, is reconcilable with
some facts. Otherwise, it would not have been considered for a moment.
Many false hypotheses have been proposed, and accepted as possible and
even probable, because reconcilable with some facts. The Ptolemaic
theory of the universe, making the earth the centre, around which the
heavens revolved in great concentric spheres, was accepted for 1400
years from A. D. 140, because it explained many things. It corresponded
with appearances. It appealed to all. Its advocates had great
difficulty in reconciling it with the motions of the planets, which
were therefore called planets or “wanderers.” But in time the
Copernican theory prevailed, because it was reconcilable with all the
facts. The evidence is so abundant that all claim it the true theory.
It is science. It is knowledge.
Because the Copernican hypothesis, the true theory of the universe, was
opposed and rejected, it does not follow that the evolution of man is
true because it is likewise opposed and rejected. If this new theory,
hypothesis, or guess stands, it can only do so, because it harmonizes
with all the facts. The law of gravitation, and every other proven
theory harmonizes with all the facts and with all other true theories.
It will be shown in this book, that a large number of facts can not be
reconciled with evolution, especially the evolution of man, thus
proving that it can not be a true theory. We really have a right to
demand the proof of a theory, and to refuse consent until proved. While
we are under no obligation to _disprove_ an unproven theory, yet it is
the shortest way to settle the matter once for all, before it has led
multitudes more astray, and wrecked the faith and hopes of the young.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account