The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments — John Shaqi
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
There is no convincing proof that any of these great and incredible
advances were ever made. If we estimate the probability of each
transmutation at 10%, which is too high, then the probability that all
these changes up to man were made is .1 raised to the 8th power,
.00000001. Therefore, there is not more than one chance out of
100,000,000 that these 8 changes were made. And if we estimate the
probability of each great change at .001, which is doubtless still too
high, the probability that man took these 8 great steps of evolution is
one out of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, or a million, million,
million, million. If we estimate the probability of each change even at
60%, which is far above all reason, the probability of man’s evolution
through these 8 changes is only 1 out of 60, which marks an
improbability close to an impossibility. The highest estimate we can
reasonably make, destroys all hope that man or even any other species
could have come by evolution. Few persons realize how improbable an
event is made which depends upon a number of possibilities or even
probabilities, until calculated by the rule of Compound Mathematical
Probability.
Imagine the Copernican or the gravitation theory depending on a number
of possibilities or probabilities! No true theory is built on such an
uncertain foundation.
But, if the evolutionists could prove that 7 out of 8 of the great
changes certainly did occur, but failed to prove the 8th, they would
lose their case. But they have failed in all. They must prove all to
win. There is not the slightest probability that any one of these
changes ever occurred. Hence, the evolution of man from this long line
of alleged ancestors is an absolute impossibility. Q. E. D.
None of these changes is _now_ occurring. There is no spontaneous
generation now. Darwin himself said that spontaneous generation in the
past was “absolutely inconceivable.” No reptiles are becoming mammals,
none becoming birds, no apes or monkeys are becoming men. No species is
now transmuted into another, no new species arises. Is not this proof
enough that such great changes never occurred?
Moreover, if dead matter caused one living germ, why did it not cause
more? If some reptiles developed into mammals, and birds, why not all?
If one family of simians became human, why not others? Why not at least
become anthropoids? Why did all other members of the simian family not
become at least part human? Why have they remained stationary?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account