The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments — John Shaqi
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
The slight external resemblance between man and the ape family is more
than offset by structural differences which deny kinship. Alfred McCann
in his great book “God—or Gorilla” says, p. 24, “Man has 12 pairs of
ribs; the gibbon and chimpanzee, 13; man has 12 dorsal vertebrae; the
chimpanzee and gorilla, 13; the gibbon, 14. The gorilla has massive
spines on the cervical vertebrae above the scapula”; and, like the
other quadrumana (4-handed animals) has an opposable thumb on the hind
foot. There are wide differences in the shape of the skull, thorax,
femur, and even the liver. The skeleton of the brutes is much more
massive. On the tips of the fingers and thumbs of the human hand are
lines arranged in whorls, for identification. In monkeys, the lines are
parallel on the finger tips, but whorls on the palm. Is it possible
that man and such brutes came from the same parents?
19. A STAGGERING SPECULATION
The theory that all plants and animals have descended from one
primordial germ, is staggering to the mind. If so, how was it? Did this
original germ split in two, like some disease germs, one of them the
beginning of plant life, and the other the head of all animal life? Or,
did vegetation only, grow from this first germ for ages, and then some
of it turn into species of animals? As if the guess were worthy of
attention, some are ready to assert that early vegetation Algae turned
into animals. Did plants become animals somewhere along the way? Or did
animals, somewhere along the way, turn into plants? How long did they
interbreed before the gap became too wide? Where are the descendants of
the union between plants and animals? If animals were first developed
from this first germ, what did they live on while there was no
vegetation? What folly is like the folly of the evolutionist who claims
that such weird speculation is science?
Great gaps between the principal divisions of the animal world are
fatal to this speculation, which rests upon nothing but the wish that
it were so. Links are lacking between marine and amphibian animals;
reptiles and birds; reptiles and mammals; between apes and man. Of
course, we would find fossils of millions of these links if there were
any. The missing links are necessary to the scheme. Is there one chance
in a million that evolution is a true hypothesis?
20. SEX
Can the evolutionist explain the origin of sex? Starting with one germ
or even a few germs, reproduction must have been by division for a
time. If the germ that became the head of all plant life, reproduced by
division, when did it begin to reproduce by seeds?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account