The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
Even H. G. Wells, who seems ready to endorse the most extravagant
views, says (Outline of History, p. 69), “We can not say that it (the
pithecanthropus) is a direct human ancestor.” On p. 116, is a “Diagram
of the Relationship of Human Races,” showing that neither the
pithecanthropus, the Heidelberg man, the Piltdown man, nor the
Neanderthal man, could have been an ancestor of the human race, because
each were the last of their species, and therefore had no descendants.
Dr. Keith, a London evolutionist, says that the Piltdown man is not an
ancestor of man, much less an intermediate between the Heidelberg man
and the Neanderthal man. Sir Ray Lancaster confesses he is “baffled and
stumped” as to the Piltdown man. Dr. Keith says the “Neanderthal man
was not quite of our species.”
Dr. Osborn says that the Heidelberg man “shows no trace of being
intermediate between man and the anthropoid ape.” Again, speaking of
the teeth of the St. Brelade man, Dr. Osborn says, “This special
feature alone would exclude the Neanderthals from the ancestry of the
higher races.”
Prof. R. S. Lull says, “Certain authorities have tried to prove that
the pithecanthropus is nothing but a large gibbon, but the weight of
authority considers it prehuman, though not in the line of direct
development in humanity.”
Prof. Cope, a distinguished anatomist, says, “The femur [of the
pithecanthropus] is that of a man, it is in no sense a connecting
link.”
In his “Men of the Old Stone Age,” Dr. Osborn puts the pithecanthropus,
the Heidelberg man, the Piltdown man, and the Neanderthal man, on limbs
which _terminate abruptly as extinct races_. They can, in no sense,
then, be the ancestors of man, or connecting links. Why, then, do they
cling so desperately to these alleged proofs, when they admit they have
no evidential value? Only sheer desperation, just as a drowning man
will clutch a straw.
Dr. W. E. Orchard says: “The remains bearing on this issue, which have
been found are very few, and their _significance is hotly disputed by
scientists themselves,—both their age, and whether they are human or
animal, or mere abnormalities_.”
Since these four creatures (of the evolutionists) can not be the
ancestors of the human race, where are their descendants? Evolutionists
are obliged to say they were the last of their kind. Strange! But there
is no other way of escape.
Prof. Bronco, of the Geological and Palaeontological Institute of
Berlin University, says, “_Man appeared suddenly in the Quaternary
period. Palaeontology tells us nothing on the subject,—it knows nothing
of the ancestors of man_.”
As fossils must be imbedded in rock, there is not a single fossil of an
ape-man in the world.
31. PICTURES IN CAVERNS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account