The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 ArgumentsWilliams, William A. (William Asbury)
Religion
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments
Williams, William A. (William Asbury)
Evolution
To bolster up the hypothesis, that some of the scraps of bones belonged
to ape-men; who lived about 50,000 years ago, we are told that, in many
caverns there are paintings of animals, some of which are extinct,
proving that the artists were ape-men of advancing intellect, living in
that day. These drawings are rude, and inexact, and the resemblance to
extinct animals rather fanciful. If the writer were to try to draw a
picture of a horse on the stone walls of a dark cavern, with no light,
it would be just as likely to resemble an extinct animal, or possibly
an animal that never did live and never will. Many of the paintings are
found in the depths of unlit caverns, often difficult of access. How
could they paint any picture in the dark, when even fire was unknown,
and the torch and lamp-wick had not yet been invented? And how could
they make a ladder, or erect scaffolding of any sort in that rude age,
before there were inventions of any kind? Yet they tell us that the
frescoes on the ceiling of the dark cavern of Altamira, Spain, were
made 25,000 to 50,000 years ago, when fire was unknown, and they ask us
to believe that several colors are used, brown, red, black, yellow, and
white; and that these drawings and colors have remained undisturbed and
unchanged through these long ages. Is it easier to believe this, than
to believe that these drawings were made by modern man, using modern
inventions? A theory left to such support, must be poverty-stricken in
argument indeed.
32. VESTIGIAL ORGANS
The claim is made that the so-called rudimentary organs in the human
body such as the appendix, are the remnants of more complete organs
inherited from our animal ancestors. It is a strange argument that a
once complete and useful organ in our alleged animal ancestors, when it
becomes atrophied in man, causes such an improvement and advance, as to
cause man to survive, when his ancestors with more perfect organs
became extinct. Man with less perfect organs became the dominant
species. If the perfect organ were better than the rudimentary organ,
how can man be the “survival of the fittest”? If rudimentary organs are
a proof of descent from animals with more extensive, if not more
perfect, organs, then both man and monkeys must be descended from the
rat, which has the longest proportionate appendix of all. If unused
muscles speak of our ancestry, the horse has the strongest claim to be
our ancestor.
But many organs, such as “the thyroid gland, the thymus gland, and the
pineal gland,” formerly classified as rudimentary organs, are found to
be very useful and necessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account