The evolution of mathematical physics : $b being the Rouse Ball lecture for 1924Lamb, Horace, Sir
History
The evolution of mathematical physics : $b being the Rouse Ball lecture for 1924
Lamb, Horace, Sir
Mathematical physics; Physics -- History
One feature which is met with in our period is the frank appeal to
intuition. This is noticeable already in the case of Fourier, as
has been already indicated, but it runs through the whole school.
Even Cauchy, who was or became something of a purist according to
the standards of his day, did not shrink on occasion from handling
[Pg 39]
divergent integrals, but managed always to come right in the end.
There is this to be said about mathematical work, in any but quite
incompetent hands, that a too careless induction sooner or later
betrays itself, and leads to a revision of the whole calculation.
The great mathematicians, whatever licence they may have allowed
themselves, have always had a sure instinct to save them from logical
disaster. The rôle which intuition plays in mathematical
discovery has sometimes been slighted or even denied. But was it not
Gauss who, questioned as to the progress of a research on which he was
engaged, replied that he had arrived at the theorems, and that it only
remained to find the proofs? For such things as existence-theorems
we must of course not look, at all events in the earlier half of our
period. The first instance of the consciousness of such a requirement
that I can call to mind occurs in Green, but he at once proceeds to
appeal to physical conceptions. He wished to satisfy himself as to
[Pg 40]
the existence of a function satisfying Laplace’s equation, which
should vanish over a closed surface, and have a definite singularity
at a given internal point. He regards it as sufficient to remark
that this is the case of an uninsulated conducting surface under the
influence of an internal charge. The same use of physical proofs is to
be found in Maxwell, and in an especial degree in the writing of the
late Lord Rayleigh. The physical mathematician may reasonably claim
a certain licence in this respect. He is often in the case of Gauss;
the proposition is certain, but having his own business to attend to,
he leaves the rigorous proof to the analyst, who ought indeed to be
very grateful to him for the exquisite logical exercise which he has
provided.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account