The evolution of mathematical physics : $b being the Rouse Ball lecture for 1924Lamb, Horace, Sir
History
The evolution of mathematical physics : $b being the Rouse Ball lecture for 1924
Lamb, Horace, Sir
Mathematical physics; Physics -- History
The same year, 1807, is still more memorable for the first instalment
of Fourier’s investigations on the Conduction of Heat, whose importance
extends far beyond the special subject. Mathematicians so eminent as
Hamilton, Maxwell, and Kelvin have found it difficult to speak of
Fourier in measured terms of appreciation, whether of the ingenuity
of his mathematical processes, the elegance of his results, or of
his broad and philosophical outlook, as revealed especially in the
preface to his formal treatise. Fourier had indeed the advantage of a
rather varied career. He was trained at first for the priesthood, then
rejected for the (royalist) artillery school, with the remark in so
many words that the lowliness of his origin would have disqualified
him “even if he had been a second Newton.” He became a pupil at the
École Normale, and later professor at the École Polytechnique. He
was included in Napoleon’s expedition to Egypt, as a Member of the
ambitious Egyptian Institute which it was proposed to found, and of
which Monge was President. Returning to France in 1802 he was made
prefect of the Department of the Isère, possibly on account of the
administrative talent which he is said to have displayed in Egypt,
and it was at Grenoble that he began the composition of his classical
work. His subsequent history, though interesting and honourable, hardly
concerns us, but the facts I have mentioned suggest that his varied and
responsible experience, as well as the literary studies which were an
obligatory part of his early education, and in which he is said to have
excelled, was not without influence on his work, or on the luminous
style in which it is explained.
[Pg 11]
At the very outset of his book we meet for the first time with a
process which now seems so obvious and familiar that the mention of it
may appear trivial. I mean the device by which the rate of change of
a physical property at any point of a medium is calculated in terms
of its flux into an element of volume. But it could hardly have been
quite obvious, for many years elapsed before so simple a matter as
the equation of continuity in Hydrodynamics was proved in this way by
William Thomson, who also pointed out its utility in the expression of
Laplace’s equation in curvilinear co-ordinates.
At a later period the process received a brilliant extension at the
hands of Maxwell, in his theory of gases, where it was applied to the
flux of momentum and also of energy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account