The Evolution of Modern OrchestrationCoerne, Louis Adolphe
History
The Evolution of Modern Orchestration
Coerne, Louis Adolphe
Instrumentation and orchestration
Before turning from this series of composers, it is again desired to
emphasize the peculiar fact that all French writers both past and
present have been consistent in first experimenting in the dramatic
field before settling down to the exacting requirements of equally
arduous and perhaps intellectually higher orchestral and chamber
music. That the authorship of a more or less important opera has been
conceded to every one of the above-mentioned composers need therefore
excite no further comment.
III.
A little coterie of Frenchmen have distinguished themselves by
almost exclusive devotion to the lightest of operatic forms. Just
as Lortzing and his contemporaries rendered incalculable service to
German musical art by clothing their vivacious productions in dainty
orchestral raiment, so has France been the gainer through the efforts
of Adam, Maillart and Delibes.
Adolphe Adam (1803) was a most productive writer. The distinctive
features of his talent are opulence of melody and rhythmic grace. The
best known of his works is, of course, the "Postillon de Longjumeau."
Maillart (1817), pupil of Halévy, winner of the Prix de Rome, and
author of six operas, was, strange to say, most successful in
composing a work that appeals especially to the German mind. "Das
Glöckchen des Eremiten" still retains its place in the standard
repertories of Germany. Delibes (1836), composer of the sprightly
comic operas: "Le Roi l'a dit" and "Lakmé," and of the charming
ballets: "Sylvia" and "Coppélia," enriched the world with a far
higher type of composition than either Adam or Maillart. His music,
by virtue of its grace and refinement, is of such intrinsic value
as to entitle Delibes to be ranked among the foremost composers of
the nineteenth century. Application to lighter forms only by no
means excludes sterling musicianship. Delibes' music is typically
French, and by its very naïveté, descriptive powers and clever
instrumentation overcomes the impediment of a frequently faulty
libretto.
IV.
It is proposed to classify under one distinctive and decidedly
exclusive heading the names of six truly eminent composers, who, as
worthy contemporaries and successors of Berlioz, may, with him, be
regarded as the foremost French representatives of the nineteenth
century. These are Thomas, Gounod, Saint-Saëns, Bizet, Chabrier,
and Massenet. All these men have become famous as dramatic writers,
but the scope of their genius is such as to entitle them to almost
equally high rank as composers of orchestral and chamber music. It
is further proposed to single out Saint-Saëns as being undoubtedly
the greatest French orchestrator since Berlioz, although the present
writer is inclined to believe that Chabrier would have equalled
him, had not his career been abruptly ended.[81] At all events,
Saint-Saëns and Richard Strauss are at present the undisputed living
masters of orchestration.[82]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account