The Evolution of Naval ArmamentRobertson, Frederick Leslie
History
The Evolution of Naval Armament
Robertson, Frederick Leslie
Naval art and science -- History; Ordnance, Naval -- History; Warships -- History
One summer afternoon the experiments took place in a shady grove in
the Charterhouse garden. Screens--“of finest tissue paper”--were set
up at intervals of fifty feet, and a common musket bored for an ounce
ball was firmly fixed in a vice so as to fire through the screens. By
repeated discharges the various deflections from the original plane of
departure were clearly shown; some of the balls whirled to the right,
some to the left of the vertical plane in which the musket lay. But not
only was the fact of this deflection established to the satisfaction
of the visitors. A simple but dramatic proof was afforded them of the
correctness of Robins’ surmise that the cause was the whirling of the
ball in flight. A musket-barrel was bent so that its last three or
four inches pointed to the left of the original plane of flight. The
ball when fired would then be expected to be thrown to the left of
the original plane. But, said Robins, since in passing through the
bent part the ball would be forced to roll upon the right-hand side
of the barrel; and as thereby the left side of the ball would turn up
against the air, and would increase the resistance on that side; then,
notwithstanding the bend of the piece to the left, the bullet itself
might incurvate towards the right. “And this, upon trial, did most
remarkably happen.”[83]
Robins by now had gained a European reputation. Mathematical
controversy and experiments in gunnery continued to occupy his time
and absorb his energies, and it was not long before he was again at
the rostrum of the Royal Society, uttering his eloquent prediction as
to the future of rifled guns. Speaking with all the emphasis at his
command he urged on his hearers the importance of applying rifling
not only to fire-arms but to heavy ordnance. That State, he said,
which first comprehended the advantages of rifled pieces; which first
facilitated their construction and armed its armies with them; would
by them acquire a superiority which would perhaps fall little short
of the wonderful effects formerly produced by the first appearance of
fire-arms. His words had little or no effect. Mechanical science was
not then equal to the task. A whole century was to elapse before rifled
ordnance came into general use. The genius of Whitworth was required to
enable the workshops of the world to cope with its refined construction.
Another subject which attracted Robins’ attention at this time was
fortification, the sister art of gunnery, which now had a vogue as a
result of the great continental wars. He was evidently regarded as an
authority on the subject, for we find him, in 1747, invited by the
Prince of Orange to assist in the defence of Berghen-op-Zoom, then
invested and shortly afterwards taken by the French.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account