The Evolution of Naval ArmamentRobertson, Frederick Leslie
History
The Evolution of Naval Armament
Robertson, Frederick Leslie
Naval art and science -- History; Ordnance, Naval -- History; Warships -- History
he related that they were found on board the _Spartiate_, one of the
ships captured on the first of August!”[103]
Continuous trials were carried out in France with shells fired
from guns. In 1798, following a series of successful experiments,
trials were prosecuted at Meudon by a special commission, who caused
24-and 36-pound shells to be fired at a target representing a
ship-of-the-line, at ranges of 400 and 600 yards. The results were
impressive, and the report rendered to Bonaparte such as to confirm
his personal conviction in the value of shell fire. Less than a year
later, we may note in passing, the Consul was himself the target of
shell fire: being subjected, at the siege of Acre, to the unpleasant
attentions of a 68-pounder carronade from the English fleet. In 1804,
with the avowed object of keeping our cruisers at a distance, he had
long howitzers cast and placed for the defence of Toulon and other
ports. And hardly a year passed but some trial was made of horizontal
fire of shells from guns and mortars.
Of the two great maritime powers, Britain had contributed more,
perhaps, towards the building up by actual practice of the system of
artillery which was shortly to come into vogue. Shell fire from mortars
had been used with far more effect by her forces than by those of her
great enemy. The invention of the carronade was in itself almost a
solution; and, though it did not lead directly to the shell gun, yet
it undoubtedly induced the weapon which most strongly resembled it:
the medium ship-gun, as designed by Congreve and Blomefield, which was
something between the carronade and the long gun, and which for a time
was mounted in our two-decked ships for the purpose of preserving unity
of calibre.
But the French, free from the bias against change of method and
material which operated in this country, seized on the possibilities
of existing elements, and combined them in such a way as to form a
complete solution of the shell-fire problem. To General Paixhans,
the eminent officer of artillery, the credit for this solution is
undoubtedly due.
§
The experiments of M. Paixhans, carried out in order to confirm the
theories on which his new system was founded, extended over several
years and resulted in the publication of two books--the _Nouvelle Force
Maritime et Artillerie_, 1822, and _Expériences faites sur une Arme
Nouvelle_, 1825.
In these works[104] the author developed in detail the scheme of ship
armament which was to win adoption, in the course of time, in the
French navy; whereby our own authorities were also gradually forced to
abandon methods and standards of force by which the British navy had
grown great. Two principles formed the basis of this scheme:--(1) unity
of calibre, embodying the maximum simplification of means; (2) shell
fire, embodying the maximum augmentation of effect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account