The Evolution of Old Testament ReligionOrchard, W. E. (William Edwin)
Religion
The Evolution of Old Testament Religion
Orchard, W. E. (William Edwin)
Bible. Old Testament -- Theology; Judaism -- History -- To 70 A.D.
Meanwhile, whatever we feel about these abstract principles, we ought
to know the facts. In the pages that follow an endeavour is made to
present the results at which a consensus of opinion has arrived. There
will be no great time spent in argument for or against these facts.
Such are to be sought in the scientific works and in the dictionaries,
which alone can deal adequately with these facts, but since many
altogether refuse to consider the facts because of the inferences
which they think can be drawn from them, this book is an earnest
plea for earnest men to consider whether it is not open to be shown
that from these facts there comes to us a much clearer understanding
of God's ways with man; a more certain conviction that in the past
God has actually spoken through the Scriptures; a clue to a better
understanding of the place Jesus occupies in the history of revelation;
and what we all need greatly to-day: a preparation of heart that we may
follow the leading of that Spirit who ever has and who ever will guide
into all truth those who are willing to follow Him. The aim of this
book is that the reader may feel that the voice which speaks in his
own heart and the voice which has guided man through all his strange
history is One, and is of God.
THE SEMITIC RACES
_Read, as Introduction to this Lecture, the Tenth Chapter of Genesis._
This is one of the most interesting documents in anthropology. It is
an attempt at a scientific ethnology, and seems to have been expanded
from the closing verses of the preceding chapter. It will be noticed
that those verses are in poetical form (R.V.), and are likely to be
very ancient.
Note the principles of classification:--
(1) Geographical. It is a very incomplete summary of the peoples of
the earth. Only those nations are mentioned that fill the horizon of
the writer's knowledge. That horizon will be found to correspond very
largely with that of the prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel.
(2) Prejudice. The evident kinship of some peoples is denied on the
ground of dislike; for the same reason, Moab and Ammon, who are well
known, are simply omitted.
The real test of kinship is language, which is here ignored.
The names are not to be taken as individuals. Of this the very form
is witness: Ludim is plural, Mizraim is dual, Tarshish is the name of
a place, and Amorite is gentilic.
Notes:--
Verse 2. Madai = Medes. Javan = the Greeks, or more particularly, the
Ionians.
Verse 4. Tarshish is probably Spain. Kittim = the Cretans. Dodanim
(read Rodanim 1 Ch. i. 7) = the inhabitants of Rhodes.
Verse 6. Mizraim: the name for Egypt. Canaan: here and elsewhere
said to be descended from Ham. Beyond all doubt the Canaanites were
a Semitic people and spoke a language akin to Hebrew. Religious
antagonism and the fact of their conquest demanded in the popular
imagination a different ancestry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account