The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Accordingly Einstein was compelled so to modify the classical laws
of mechanics as to ensure their invariance to the Lorentz-Einstein
transformations. This modification was then found to entail the
relativity of mass. By this we mean that the mass of a given body
could no longer be regarded as an invariant, independent of the body’s
relative motion. On the contrary, it was now found to increase with
the relative velocity of the body, becoming infinite when the velocity
of light was reached. In the same way the relativity of force was
[Pg 157]
established, and classical Newtonian mechanics, with its invariance of
mass and force, was proved to be incorrect, and acceptable only as a
first approximation for slow velocities.
It also followed that no material body could ever move with a speed
greater than or even equal to the speed of light, since it would
require a force of infinite magnitude to give it this critical
velocity. A number of paradoxes associated with the theory are due to
the critic’s initial assumption that the observer is moving with the
speed of light. But all these paradoxes may be dismissed at the outset,
since no observer could ever move with such a speed.
When the mathematical expression of the mass of a body in relative
motion was considered, it was found to be decomposable into several
parts. First of all we had the mass of the body as at rest (this was
the mass which classical science assumed to be invariant, i.e.,
independent of the body’s motion). To this was added the vis
viva, or energy of motion of the body with respect to the observer,
as well as a number of other terms depending on the relative velocity.
These last terms were, however, of very minor importance unless the
relative motion of the body was considerable. Thus the mass of a body
in relative motion was increased over its mass at rest by its energy
of motion or vis viva, so that the distinction between mass and
energy became obscured.
Since part of the mass of the body when in motion was due to its
vis viva, it appeared probable that the entire mass of the
body, whether at rest or in motion, was due to its energy of one kind
or another. Now matter even at rest was known to contain energy, as
exhibited by radioactive phenomena and by the thermal effects produced
by chemical combinations. So it was natural to assume that the mass of
the body at rest was due to its contained or bound energy, which would
be released were the body to disintegrate into nothingness. The formula
connecting this energy of constitution of the body with its mass was
obtained from the mathematical expression of the mass, and it was
found that in C.G.S. units the contained energy was equal to the mass
multiplied by the square of the velocity of light. From this formula
it is easy to realise the tremendous liberation of energy and the dire
consequences that would result from the complete disintegration of even
a small parcel of matter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account