The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Another consequence of these discoveries was that any variation in the
internal energy of a body maintained at rest, such as would result from
compressing it, heating it or electrifying it, would be accompanied
by an increase in its mass at rest.[50] This discovery enabled us
to account for a curious discrepancy in the comparative masses of
[Pg 158]
the helium and of the hydrogen atom, a mystery which had never been
accounted for by classical science.
To illustrate: The nucleus of the hydrogen atom is composed of one
proton; and the nucleus of the helium atom is composed of four protons,
held together by two electrons. The protons alone having a mass of
any importance, it seemed logical to assume that the mass of the
helium atom would be four times that of the hydrogen atom. Accurate
measurements proved, however, that there was a slight deficiency, and
that the mass of the helium atom was less than four times that of the
hydrogen atom. Classical science had recognised that the closer the
electrons and protons were packed together in the nucleus, the smaller
would be the electric energy of the atom, but it appeared impossible
to account for the deficiency in mass. The theory of relativity by
its identification of mass and energy gave an obvious solution to the
problem. The deficiency in mass of the helium atom was to be ascribed
to the loss of energy radiated under the form of heat and light when
the electrons and protons were being packed together. At the same time
it became possible to calculate with precision from the loss of mass
the precise amount of energy that had been liberated. It followed that
in regions of the cosmos where the helium atoms were in process of
formation owing to the grouping together of the protons and electrons,
enormous amounts of heat and light would be radiated continually.
This consequence of the theory enabled astrophysicists to account for
the enormous temperature of the sun, maintained through thousands of
millions of years in spite of incessant radiation in a frigid space.
Helium atoms are in constant process of formation in the sun, and in
this fact resides the source of its apparently inexhaustible supply of
energy.
[Pg 159]
Through this constant radiation of energy, the sun and stars would be
gradually losing in mass; for light was of course a form of energy. As
such, light should possess mass and momentum and exert a pressure over
bodies on which it impinged. This pressure, indeed, was not unknown,
since it resulted from Maxwell’s equations and had been verified
experimentally by Lebedew and by Nichols and Hull. As a matter of
fact it was to this pressure of light that the apparent repulsion of
comets’ tails away from the sun was supposed to be due. Nevertheless,
though not a new discovery, the fact that Einstein’s theory entailed
momentum for light constituted one of the many indirect confirmations
of the theory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account