The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Einstein’s premises being consistent (as can be proved mathematically),
no question can arise as to the consistency of Einstein’s conclusions;
premises and conclusions must all stand or fall together. The
major problem, then, is to analyse the legitimacy of the theory
from the standpoint of its ability to portray the real world of
physical phenomena. Some lay critics, such as Bergson, alarmed by
the revolutionary nature of Einstein’s discoveries and animated by
a desire to retain their classical belief in the absolute nature of
simultaneity remaining the same for all observers, have endeavoured to
uphold this intermediary view. They have maintained that from a purely
mathematical standpoint the systems of measurement of relativity might
confer greater simplicity on the purely mathematical treatment of the
equations of electrodynamics; but that in no case was it permissible to
assume that the anticipations of the theory could ever correspond to
what we should actually measure with rigid rods and ordinary clocks. We
may dismiss this view summarily. Were it correct, none of the physical
anticipations of Einstein’s theory would have been verified by physical
experiments.
Furthermore, a theory such as Einstein’s is one of mathematical
physics, not one of pure mathematics. It is not merely necessary
that the deductions of the theory be mathematically consistent with
the premises. They must also lead us to anticipations which will be
verified by experiment. If they failed in this respect, they would
still portray the workings of a possible rational world; but the theory
itself, yielding erroneous physical previsions, could never allow
us to foresee and to foretell, and no scientist would ever dream of
upholding it. In short, we must recognise that if Einstein’s premises
are accepted, we must assume that measurements conducted with natural
rods and natural clocks would yield the previsions of the theory. We
must also remember that by natural clocks we do not mean clocks
arbitrarily adjusted. We mean clocks such as vibrating atoms, or,
more generally, all periodic physical processes evolving in a state of
isolation. Likewise, by natural rods we mean our ordinary material rods
maintained in the same conditions of temperature and pressure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account