The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Let us now consider another type of field of force known as the
inertial field. In perfectly free space, far from matter, there exists
no field of force so long as we refer our observations to a Galilean
frame. But if now we step into an accelerated or a rotating frame, we
shall experience the effects of a field of force which we will ascribe
to forces of inertia. Not only our own human bodies, but, in addition,
all free bodies, will be subjected to the actions of these forces.
Thus, consider a disk that is rotating, and a ball rolling without
friction on the disk’s surface. If the ball is sent from the centre
of the disk to its periphery it will of course follow a straight line
at constant speed with respect to the earth or to any other Galilean
frame. But then, with respect to the rotating disk itself, its course
can no longer be rectilinear and uniform. Instead of following one of
the radii of the rotating disk, it will follow a curve as though it had
been pulled sideways by some force.
This result is general. If we ourselves tried to advance along
one of the radii of the rotating disk we should experience a real
physical force pulling us sideways. To all intents and purposes, when
we referred events to the rotating disk and not to the non-rotating
earth (the rotation of the earth being so slow that we may neglect it
as a first approximation), the physical existence of a field of force
would have to be taken into consideration. The precise type of force we
have mentioned is called the Coriolis force; in addition, there
also exists another type of force, the better-known centrifugal
force. Both these types of force are called forces of inertia.
It is their ensemble which constitutes the field of inertial force
existing in a rotating frame.
If, in place of a rotating frame, we had considered an accelerated
railway compartment, the field of inertial force would have been
disposed in a different manner. In the case of a train moving with
constant acceleration along a straight line, the field of inertial
force generated would have been of the uniform variety, disposed
longitudinally through the train.
All these different illustrations show us that whereas, in a Galilean
frame, no field of force exists, yet a field springs into existence
automatically as soon as we place ourselves in any accelerated frame.
[Pg 248]
It is for this reason that accelerated frames can be distinguished
physically from Galilean frames; and it is owing to this generation of
physical fields of force that accelerated motion must be regarded as
absolute, whereas velocity, giving rise to no such fields, yields us no
means of distinguishing one velocity from another, hence is relative.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account