The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
With these new views, the force of gravitation acting at a point loses
its attributes of absoluteness. Just like a force of inertia, a force
of gravitation betrays a relationship existing between the frame of
reference selected and the surrounding conditions of the world. Just as
a force of inertia can be annulled by changing the motion of our frame,
so now can a force of gravitation be annulled. This does not mean that
a force of gravitation is unreal. It is perfectly real, since it can
be detected and measured. But it is no longer an absolute; it is a
relative, like a force of inertia, for its value varies with our choice
of a frame of reference. Henceforth no intrinsic difference exists
between a force of gravitation and a force of inertia; these forces
are of the same essence. When, therefore, we are in the presence of a
force acting on mass, we may refer to it as a force without specifying
whether it has been generated by the acceleration of our frame (field
of inertia) or by the proximity of matter (field of gravitation).[82]
Einstein maintains the appellation of a gravitational field of force.
But he applies it indifferently to fields which classical science
would have considered due to the acceleration of the frame, and to
the fields which classical science would have recognised as generated
by the proximity of matter. By classing both types of fields as
gravitational, his object is to differentiate these identical types of
fields from fields of other types, such as fields of electric, magnetic
or electromagnetic forces.
However, it is well to caution the beginner against a misunderstanding
which might cause him some trouble. In classical science the word
“gravitational” was always associated with the attraction caused by
matter. In Einstein’s theory, when we identify an inertial field with a
gravitational one and call both these species of fields gravitational,
it is not meant to imply that an exact replica of the inertial field
could be reproduced by disposing matter in a suitable way with respect
to our frame of reference. Inversely, a field of force produced
by matter cannot be duplicated in every detail by communicating a
suitable accelerated motion to our frame of reference in free space
far from matter. In spite of the complete identification of forces of
gravitation and forces of inertia, there still exists a difference in
the spatial distribution of the field of force, according to whether
it is produced by the proximity of matter or by the acceleration of
our frame. In consequence, although all fields of force may be called
gravitational fields, regardless of whether they be generated by matter
or by acceleration, we must remember that the actual lay of these
[Pg 257]
fields through space will vary with their origin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account