The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein — John Shaqi
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
In a more thorough treatment of non-Euclidean geometry other
non-metrical methods of presentation are sometimes adhered to. One
of these is based on the theory of groups and projective geometry;
another is due to the discoveries of Levi-Civita and Weyl and depends
on the fundamental concept of an infinitesimal parallel displacement;
it opens the way to Weyl’s still more general geometry. Still another
mathematical method of exploring space is that of continuous tracks
which was investigated by Eisenhart and Veblen. In this book we shall
refrain from discussing these more difficult methods, for they present
too technical an aspect;[10] but it would be a great mistake to assume
that these imaginative flights of the pure mathematicians were of no
utility to physical science. Apart from the deep philosophical light
which they throw on the entire problem of space, we know from past
experience that what was at its inception a pure mathematical dream has
more than once become at some later date the image of physical reality.
Non-Euclidean geometry, and possibly Weyl’s still stranger geometry,
are cases in point.
We have now to consider a number of questions pertaining to location
and motion in space. Mathematical space, as we have seen, is
-dimensional and amorphous. But in order to bring it into closer
contact with the physical space of experience we may assume the
necessary postulates of order and contiguity to have been specified.
We thus obtain three-dimensional mathematical space. Now mathematical
space, in view of its amorphous nature, is essentially relative. The
very homogeneity of space, its sameness “here” as “there,” precludes
our being able to differentiate one absolute position from another.
It will follow that absolute motion, i.e., a variation of
absolute position in empty amorphous mathematical space, can have no
significance.
Our sole means of giving significance to position and motion will be
by selecting some three-dimensional frame of reference as standard.
For instance, we might consider three mutually perpendicular axes
[Pg 45]
meeting at a point. A more concrete illustration would be afforded by
considering the two adjoining walls and the floor of our room. Then,
after having selected the standard rods which we intend to employ, and
also a clock, we should proceed to measure the position and change of
position of an object with respect to our room. This would yield us the
relative position and motion of the object (relative to our room).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account