The Evolution of StatesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
History
The Evolution of States
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Europe -- Politics and government; Great Britain -- Politics and government; Political science -- History
Wealth is not yet a matter of land-owning--the main element of
property is cattle;[21] and the bulk of the land is _ager
occupatorius_, a great "common" on which all men's cattle feed.
The voteless free plebeian has simply his home and homestead, "toft
and croft," the latter being two yokes (= five roods) of land, on
which he raises the grain and olives and vegetables that feed his
household.[22] This goes to his heir. Here arises another problem.
E.W. Robertson (as last cited) decides that the "two yokes" can
have been only "the homestead, and could not have included the farm
or property attached to it." The _heredium_, he holds, following
Pliny (_Hist. Nat._, xix, 19), and citing Livy (vi, 36), was only
in the _hortus_, the house and garden, "and not in the arable or
pasture land." But surely the arable was on a different footing
from the pasture land (_ager compascus_). Corn was not grown in
common, unless it were by the _gentes_ (Mommsen, vol. i, pp. 38,
72, 193). The solution seems to be that given by Greenidge, that as
"the _heredium_ consisted only of two _jugera_ (Festus, p. 53), an
amount obviously insufficient for the maintenance of a family,"
"there must have been _ager privatus_ as well, owned by some larger
unit, and this unit would naturally have been the gens" (_Roman
Public Life_, p. 15).
Among general historians of Rome Mommsen seems to be the first to
note this circumstance, and he gives neither details nor evidence.
Schwegler, discussing (i, 619) the theory of Puchta that there was
no private property in Rome before the "arrival" of the plebs,
admits that among the ancient Germans the land was yearly
apportioned among the groups as such, but finds that "Roman
tradition tells of nothing of the kind." (So Greenidge, p. 15.) In
any case, Mommsen, while insisting that "the fields (_sic_) of the
gentes (_Geschlechts-Genossen_) in the earliest period lay
together" (_Staatsrecht_, III, i, 24; cp. p. 94), admits that such
gentile ownership had at an early stage disappeared (_früh
verschwundenen_). There was then no communal tillage in the
historic period. Cincinnatus, in the legend, returns to the plough
on his own croft. Further, the early complaints cited by Livy as to
the "two yokes" being "hardly enough to raise a roof on or to make
a grave in" were addressed by the tribunes on behalf of plebeians
to patricians who each had above five hundred yokes. The non-client
plebeians then had no share in the land of the _gentes_ or clans,
being themselves in large part dispossessed by conquest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account