EVERY one knows in a general way what is meant by the doctrine of
descent--that it is the theory which maintains that the forms of
life, animals and plants, which we see on our earth to-day, have not
been the same from all time, but have been developed, by a process
of transformation, from others of an earlier age, and are in fact
descended from ancestors specifically different. According to this
doctrine of descent, the whole diversity of animals and plants owes
its origin to a transformation process, in the course of which the
earliest inhabitants of our earth, extremely simple forms of life,
were in part evolved in the course of time into forms of continually
increasing complexity of structure and efficiency of function, somewhat
in the same way as we can see every day, when any higher animal is
developed from a single cell, the egg-cell, not suddenly or directly,
but connected with its origin by a long series of ever more complex
transformation stages, each of which is the preparation for, and leads
on to the succeeding one. The theory of descent is thus a theory of
development or evolution. It does not merely, as earlier science did,
take for granted and describe existing forms of life, but regards them
as having become what they are through a process of evolution, and it
seeks to investigate the stages of this process, and to discover the
impelling forces that lie behind it. Briefly, the theory of descent is
an attempt at a scientific interpretation of the origin and diversity
of the animate world.
In these lectures, therefore, we have not merely to show on what
grounds we make this postulate of an evolution process, and to marshall
the facts which necessitate it; we must also try to penetrate as far
as possible towards the causes which bring about such transformations.
For this reason we are forced to go beyond the limits of the theory of
descent in the narrow sense, and to deal with the general processes of
life itself, especially with reproduction and the closely associated
problem of heredity. The transformation of species can only be
interpreted in one of two ways; either it depends on a peculiar
internal force, which is usually only latent in the organism, but from
time to time becomes active, and then, to a certain extent, moulds it
into new forms; or it depends on the continually operating forces which
make up life, and on the way in which these are influenced by changing
external conditions. Which of these alternatives is correct we can only
undertake to determine when we know the phenomena of life, and as far
as possible their causes, so that it is indispensable to make ourselves
acquainted with these as far as we can.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account