Many objections have been made to the interpretation of mimicry by
selection. It has been asserted that butterflies are exposed to injury
from birds only to an inconsiderable extent, not sufficient to account
for such an intense and persistent process of selection, because they
are not very welcome morsels, on account of the large and uneatable
wings and the relatively small body. Doubt has also been raised as to
the immunity of the models, which has not been proved in many of the
species in regard to which it is assumed. Finally, it is maintained
that the advantage which resemblance to an immune model brings is
not proved, but is purely hypothetical; and that it is probable that
the birds do not distinguish the colours and markings of the flying
butterflies at all, but are at the most only deceived by resemblances
in their manner of flight.
The last objection contains a certain amount of truth, inasmuch as
the manner of flight always plays a part in the mimicry of a strange
species. We shall see later how much the instincts of a species
contribute to the deception in all cases of protective colouring.
It is, therefore, not improbable that, in many cases, the imitation
of the flight of an immune species, and a gradually increasing
familiarity with the habitats of the same immune species, preceded the
modification of the colour. Indeed, the slow flight of immune species
(Heliconiidæ) has been unanimously emphasized by observers, as a factor
in facilitating the recognition of the butterflies by the sharp-sighted
birds.
That it was not only in earlier ages of the world's history that
butterflies were much persecuted, as some have supposed, but that they
are so still, seems to me indisputable in view of the observations
of the last quarter of a century. Even in this country, where both
butterflies and insect-eating birds are being more and more crowded out
through cultivation, a considerable number of butterflies in flight
fall victims to the birds. Kennel gives observations on this point in
regard to the white-throat; Caspari for the swallows. The latter let
about a hundred little tortoiseshell butterflies (_Vanessa antiopa_)
fly from his window, 'but not ten of them reached the neighbouring
wood,' all the rest being eaten by swallows, 'which congregated in
numbers in front of his window.' Kathariner observed, in the highlands
of Asia Minor, a flock of bee-eaters (_Merops_) which caught in flight
and swallowed a great many individuals of a very beautiful diurnal
butterfly (_Thais cerisyi_).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account