species look alike, be divided among the whole 'mimicry ring,' as we
may say. The advantage of the resemblance is thus obvious, and we
can understand why a process of selection should develop among such
inedible species which should result in their being readily mistaken
for one another; we can understand why, in the neighbourhood of Fritz
Müller's home, Blumenau, in the province of Santa Catarina in South
Brazil, the Danaidæ, species of _Lycorea_; the Heliconiidæ, _Heliconius
eucrate_ and _Eueides isabella_; and the Neotropinæ, _Mechanitis
lysimnia_ and species of _Melinæa_, should all exhibit the same
colours, brown, black and yellow, in a similar pattern, on similarly
shaped wings. The agreement is by no means perfect in detail, but it
can be noticed in all parts of South America inhabited by species of
these genera, and the same differences which distinguish, for instance,
the two species of _Heliconius_ flying in two different regions,
also distinguish the two species of _Eueides_ and the two species
of _Mechanitis_. In Honduras we find the same mutually protective
company of inedible genera as in Santa Catarina, but represented by
other species, which all differ from the species in Santa Catarina
in the same characters, as, for instance, that they have two instead
of one pale yellow cross-stripe on the anterior wings. The species
are: _Lycorea atergatis_, _Heliconius telchinia_, _Eueides dynastes_,
_Mechanitis doryssus_, and _Melinæa imitata_[5]. In the environs of
Bahia this mimicry ring consists of the following species: _Heliconius
eucrate_, _Lycorea halia_, _Mechanitis lysimnia_, and _Melinæa ethra_,
as figured on Pl. II, Fig. 12, iv, and such a mutual assurance society
has always one or other edible species as mimic. The larger the mimetic
assurance company is, the less harm can mimics do to it. In the case
figured it is two Pieridæ already known to us that have fairly well
assumed the Heliconiid guise, namely, _Dismorphia astynome_ (Pl.
II, Figs. 18 and 19) and _Perhybris pyrrha_ (Pl. II, Figs. 16 and 17).
In the latter of these the male still has, on the upper surface, just
the appearance of one of our common Garden-whites, while the female is
coloured quite like the Heliconiidæ, but without having lost the form
of wing of the Whites. The larger the mimetic company is the greater
will be the protection afforded to its palatable mimics, since they
will be the more rarely seized by way of experiment. It is, of course,
obvious that in this kind of mimicry--that is, in the imitation of an
unpalatable and rejected species for protection--it is presupposed as
a general postulate that the edible mimics are considerably in the
minority, as Darwin showed; for if it were otherwise their enemies
would soon discover that among the apparently unpalatable species there
were some which were pleasant to taste. Here, too, the facts bear out
the theory, although exceptions can easily be imagined, and do seem to
occur.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account