WE have hitherto considered animals with especial regard to the
variation and re-adaptation of morphological characters, e.g.
modifications of form and colour; and we have now to ask whether their
behaviour also is to be referred as to its origin, in whole or in
part, to the principle of selection. All around us we can see that
animals know how to use their parts or organs in a purposeful manner:
the duckling swims at once upon the water; the chicken which has just
been hatched from the egg pecks at the seeds lying on the ground; the
butterfly but newly emerged from the pupa, as soon as its wings have
dried and hardened, knows how to use them in flight; and the predatory
wasp requires no instruction to recognize her victim, a particular
caterpillar, a grasshopper, or some other definite insect; she knows
how to attack it, to paralyse it by stings, and then hesitates not
a moment as to what she has to do next; she drags it to her nest,
deposits it in one of the cells already prepared for her future brood,
lays a single egg upon it, and roofs the cell carefully over. It is
only because all these complex acts are so precisely performed, as
precisely as if the wasp knew why she performed them, that the species
is able to maintain its existence, for only thus can the rearing of the
next generation be secured. Out of the egg there slips a little larva,
which at once makes for the paralysed victim, feeds upon it, and grows
thereby, then, within the shelter of the closed cell, passes through
the pupa stage and is transformed into a perfect wasp. Many species
of these predatory wasps do not lay the egg directly beside or upon
their prey, but lest its movements should endanger their offspring,
they hang the egg above it by a silken thread. It is thus in security,
and the young larva, too, when it appears, can withdraw to its safely
swinging resting-place as soon as danger threatens from the convulsive
struggles of the unfortunate victim at whose body it is gnawing.
Every animal has a great many such 'instincts,' which lead it, indeed
force it, to act appropriately towards an end, without having any
consciousness of that end. For how should the butterfly know what
flying is, or that it possessed the power of flight at all, or who
could have shown the predatory wasp, when she wakened from the pupa
sleep to quite a new kind of life, all that she had to do in order to
procure food for herself and to secure shelter and nourishment for
the brood which was still enclosed within her ovary? Since species
have developed from other species, these regulators of the body, the
instincts, cannot have been the same in earlier times; they must have
evolved out of the instincts of ancestors, and the questions we have to
ask are: By what factors? In what way? Has the principle of selection
been operative here too, or can we refer instincts to the inherited
effects of use and disuse?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account