And this is what we actually do find. All the arrangements of the
flowers--their colour, their form, their honey-guides, their hairy
honey-paths (Iris), their fragrance, and their honey itself--are all
indirectly useful to the plant itself, because they all co-operate in
compelling the honey-seeking insect to effect the fertilization of
the flower. This is most clearly seen in the case of the so-called
'Deceptive' flowers, which attract insects by their size and beauty,
their fragrance, and their resemblance to other flowers, and force
their visitors to be the means of their cross-fertilization, although
they contain no nectar at all. This is the case, according to Hermann
Müller, with the most beautiful of our indigenous orchids, the lady's
slipper (_Cypripedium calceolaris_). This flower is visited by bees
of the genus _Andrena_, which creep into the large wooden-shoe-shaped
under lip in the search for honey, only to find themselves prisoners,
for they cannot get out, at least by the way they came in, because of
the steep and smoothly polished walls of the flower. There is only one
way for the bee; it must force itself under the stigma, which it can
only do with great exertion, and not without being smeared with pollen,
which it carries to the next flower into which it creeps. It can only
leave this one in the same way, and thus the pollen is transferred to
the stigma by a mechanical necessity.
Such remarkable cases remind us in some ways of those cases of mimicry
in which the deceptions have to be used with caution or they lose their
effect. One might be disposed to imagine that such an intelligent
insect as a bee would not be deceived by the lady's slipper more than
once, and would not creep into a second flower after discovering that
there was no nectar in the first. But this conclusion is not correct,
for the bees are well accustomed in many flowers to find that the
nectar has already been taken by other bees; they could therefore not
conclude from one unsuccessful visit that the _Cypripedium_ did not
produce nectar at all, but would try again in a second, a third, and a
fourth flower. If these orchids had abundantly covered flower-spikes
like many species of _Orchis_, and if the species were common, the bees
would probably soon learn not to visit them, but the reverse is the
case. There is usually only one or, at most, two open flowers on the
lady's slipper, and the plant is rare, and probably occurs nowhere in
large numbers.
If we could find a flower in which the nectar lay open and accessible
to all insects, and which did not require any service from them
in return, the case could not be interpreted in terms of natural
selection; but we do not know of any such case.
[Illustration: FIG. 51. The Yucca-moth (_Pronuba yuccasella_). _M_,
laying eggs in the ovary of the Yucca flower. _n_, the stigma. After
Riley.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account