From another category of sexual differences we see in how many ways
species-selection and sexual selection play into each other's hands.
In many species of animals the males are eager for combat, and they
are equipped with special weapons, or excel the females in general
strength of body. As these males struggle, in the literal sense of the
word, for the possession of the females, Darwin referred to sexual
selection those distinguishing characters which gave the stronger male
the victory over the weaker, and thus raised the victorious characters
to the rank of general characters of the species. And it certainly
cannot be doubted that, for instance, the strength and the antlers of
the stag must have been increased through the combats which recurred
every year at the breeding season, for the stronger always win in these
battles. The case is the same with the strength and the weapons of many
other male animals. The lion is effectively protected by his mane from
the bite of a rival, and the same protective arrangement occurs in
quite a different family of mammals--in an eared seal, which is called
the 'sea-lion' for this very reason. Among the seals the secondary
sexual characters are often very strongly developed, at least in all
the polygamous species, for in these the struggle for the females is
very keen. In the 'sea-lions' and 'sea-elephants' there are often fifty
females to one male, and the latter are 'enormously larger' than the
females, while in monogamous species of seal the two sexes are alike in
size.
Darwin has shown that actual combat for the females takes place among
most mammals, not only among stags, lions, and seals, but even among
the moles and the timid hares. Even among birds such combats occur, and
this is sometimes particularly noteworthy in those species in which the
males possess the most decorative colouring, like the humming-birds. In
some cases among birds there has also been a development of weapons.
Witness the spur of the cock, whose merciless combats with his rivals
Man has, as is well known, made positively atrocious for his own
amusement, by preventing the flight of the vanquished.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account