In Darwin's great work on sexual selection a considerable number of
cases are cited from among lower vertebrates, such as crocodiles
and fishes, and even from insects, in which the males fight for
the possession of the females, and exhibit distinctive masculine
characters adapted to such combats. But I do not propose to enter upon
a discussion of such cases, since my aim is rather to elucidate the
relation between sexual selection and species-selection than to discuss
all the phenomena of the former in detail. But the combats of males
illustrate with particular clearness the relation of sexual selection
and species-selection, since many of the weapons or protective
arrangements which may have arisen through sexual selection imply at
the same time an improvement to the species in relation to the struggle
for existence. Thus greater strength or sharper and larger teeth in the
males mean a gain to the species, and it is indifferent to the species
whether the weaker males succumb to a strange enemy (species-selection)
or to their stronger rivals (sexual selection), provided only that the
better equipped survive and leave descendants similarly endowed.
I have intentionally begun the consideration of sexual selection with
the cases most difficult to interpret on this theory, with those which
have called forth the greatest divergence of opinion--the decorative
colours and forms, the song of birds and of insects, the alluring
odours--in short, all the courtship-adaptations of the males; these are
the most difficult to deal with, because it is not easy to demonstrate
directly that the females _do_ choose. But if we revise them briefly
in reverse order, I believe that all doubt as to the reality of choice
on the part of the females will disappear. Thus the last-mentioned
sexual characters of greater strength and greater perfection of weapons
and defence in the males have been evolved by sexual selection in
close co-operation with species-selection. We should have to deny
species-selection altogether if we were to dispute this form of sexual
selection, which is closely connected with pure species-selection,
such, for instance, as is revealed in the production of dwarf males,
where there does not seem to be any aid from sexual selection at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account