made one species adapted for the plain, another for the mountain forest
were _already there_; they can only be referred to personal selection,
which brought about the adaptation of their ancestors in the course
of ages to the conditions of their life. Something similar is true of
the adaptations of the tissues; the differentiation of the individual
kinds of cells is an ancient inheritance, and depends upon personal
selection, but their distribution and arrangement into specially
adapted tissues, so far as there is any plasticity at all, depends
upon histonal selection. Obviously, however, only as far as the tissue
is plastic, that is, with the power of adjusting itself to particular
local conditions. Only adaptations of this kind can be referred to
histonal selection; the ground-plan, even of the most complicated
tissue, such as the large glands of mammals, the kidneys, the liver,
and so on, must have been implicit in the germ, and must therefore be
referred to personal selection. A precise limitation of the respective
spheres of action of personal selection and histonal selection is not
possible as yet, since hardly any investigations on the subject are
available.
Roux undoubtedly over-estimated the influence of his 'struggle
of parts' when he believed that the most delicate adaptations of
the different kinds of cells depended on it. I admit that, for a
considerable time, I made the same mistake, until it became clear to
me, as it did first in regard to the sex-cells, that this is not, and
cannot be the case. How, for instance, could the diverse and minutely
detailed adaptations of the sex-cells--which we are to discuss in a
subsequent lecture--have arisen in this way? As far as the individual
sperm-cell is concerned, it is a matter of indifference whether its
head is a little thinner or thicker, its point a little sharper
or blunter, its tail a little stronger or weaker. This does not
decide whether the cell is to thrive better, or to occur in greater
numbers than some other variety. But it does decide whether it is to
be able to penetrate through the minute micropyle, or through the
firm egg-envelope, into the egg, there to effect fertilization. An
individual with less well formed sperm-cells will be able to fertilize
fewer eggs, and therefore to leave fewer descendants which might
inherit its tendency to produce inferior sperm-cells, and conversely.
Thus it is not the sperm-cells of any one individual which are selected
according to their fitness, it is the individuals themselves which
compete with one another in the production of germ-cells which shall
fertilize best, that is, most certainly. The struggle is thus not
intercellular, but a struggle between persons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account