Or let us think of a herbaceous plant, in appearance something like a
belladonna, rich in leaves and very juicy, but not poisonous. It would
doubtless be a favourite food with the animals of the forest, and it
would not, therefore, attain to more than a sparse occurrence, since
few of the individuals would be able to form seeds. But now let us
assume that a stuff of very unpleasant taste develops in the stem and
leaves of some of the individuals, as may easily happen through very
slight changes in the chemical metabolism of the plant, what, then,
could result but that such individuals would be less readily eaten than
the others? A process of selection must, therefore, ensue, and the
unpleasant-tasting specimens of the plant would be much more frequently
spared, and consequently would bear seed much oftener than the
palatable ones. Thus the number of unpalatable plants would increase
from year to year. If the stuff in question were not only unpalatable
but poisonous, or gradually became so, a plant would in time be evolved
which would be absolutely safe from being devoured by animals, just as
the deadly nightshade (_Atropa belladonna_) actually is.
Or let us suppose that a stretch of water is inhabited by a species of
carp, which have hitherto had no large enemy, and so have become lazy
and slow, and that there migrates from the sea into this stretch of
water a large species of pike. At first numerous carp will fall victims
to the pike, and the pike will rapidly increase in number. But if all
the carp were not equally lazy and dull-witted, if some of them were
quicker and more intelligent, these would, on an average, become more
rarely the victims of the pike, and numerous individuals with these
better qualities would survive in each generation, till ultimately
there were no others, and the useful characters would gradually become
intensified, and so a more active and wary race of carp would arise.
Let us suppose, however, that the increased activity and wariness would
not alone suffice to preserve the colony from extinction; it might
require also an increased fertility to prevent the normal number from
being permanently lowered; but even this could eventually be brought
about by natural selection, if the nature of the species and the
general conditions of its life permitted. For there are variations of
fertility in every species, and if the chance of seeing some of its
eggs become mature animals were greater for the more fertile female
than for the less fertile, _ceteris paribus_, a process of selection
must take place, which would result in an increase of fertility as far
as that was possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account