How phylogeny is condensed in ontogeny can be understood readily
enough in a general way, although we cannot profess to have any
insight into the detailed processes. The continuity of the germ-plasm
brings about inheritance, in that it is continually handing over to
the germ-plasm of the next generation the determinant-complex of the
preceding one. Every new adaptation at any stage whatever depends
on the variation of particular determinants within the germ-plasm,
and this in its turn depends on germinal selection, that is, on the
struggle of the different determinant-variants among themselves, and
on the variation in a definite direction which arises from this, as
we have already shown. A new kind of determinant can never arise of
itself, but always only from already existing determinants, and through
variation of these. But as spontaneous variation never causes all the
homologous determinants of a germ-plasm to vary in quite the same way,
but only a majority of them, there always remains a minority of the
old determinants, which may, under certain circumstances, predominate
again, as is proved by the aberrations in _Vanessa_ species due to
cold, and by many other kinds of reversion.
But it is not this variation which leads to the prolongation of
ontogeny, and the repetition of the phyletic stages within it. In this
case it is rather that a new character takes the place of an old one,
not that it is added to it. A black spot may arise instead of a red
one, but not first a black spot and then a red one. Of course we still
know far too little in regard to the intimate succession of events in
the stages of ontogeny to be able to say definitely that, in such
apparently simple transformations, the older stage does not, in every
ontogeny, precede the more recent one as a preparation for it, though
it may be only for a brief and transient period.
It is certain, however, that variations such as the addition of a new
stage in ontogeny are undergone, and that this implies the occurrence
of something really quite new. Therefore such a new stage can arise
only from the germ-plasm, by the duplication, and in part variation, of
the determinants of the preceding stage. If, for instance, the body of
a Crustacean be lengthened by a segment, this must be due to a process
of this kind, and in such a case it is intelligible enough that the new
segment can be formed in the ontogeny only after the development of the
older preceding one, for its determinants come from that, and are from
the beginning so arranged that they are only liberated to activity by
the formation of the preceding segment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account