We can infer with certainty, from the observational data at our
disposal, that the disappearance of useless parts is regulated by
definite laws; but it is too soon to attempt to formulate these laws,
or even to trace them back to their mechanical causes. As we have
already said, a much more comprehensive collection of facts, and
above all one which has been made on a definite plan, is a necessary
preliminary condition to this. But so much at least we may gather
from the facts before us, that the degeneration of an organ begins
at the final stage, and is transferred gradually backwards into the
embryogenesis. Thus the two fingers of birds which have disappeared
since Cretaceous times are still indicated in every bird-embryo,
though they subsequently degenerate. In various mammals 'pre-lacteal
tooth-germs' have been demonstrated in the jaws of embryos, which show
us that not only did ancestors exist whose dentition was the modern
'milk-teeth,' but that still more remote ancestors possessed another
set of teeth, which was crowded out by the 'milk-teeth'; thus the teeth
of the ancestors of the modern right whale (_Balæna mysticetus_) are
only represented in the embryo of to-day in the form of dental pits.
And, as we saw already, the Os centrale so characteristic of the wrist
of lower vertebrates only appears in Man at a very early embryonic
stage, and disappears again as such in the further course of the
embryogenesis.
We may perhaps give a preliminary statement of this law as follows: It
is impossible that any part or organ should be removed suddenly from
the ontogeny without bringing the whole into disorder, and the least
serious disturbance of the course of development will undoubtedly be
caused if the final stage of the part in question become rudimentary
first. Only after this has happened, and the neighbouring parts have
adapted themselves to the disappearance, can this extend to the stages
immediately preceding it, so that these too degenerate, and allow
the surrounding parts to adapt themselves. The further back into the
ontogeny the disappearance extends the greater will be the number of
other structures affected in some way or other by the degeneration, and
these must not all be brought suddenly into new conditions, else the
whole course of development would suffer. Thus at first only those
determinants may disappear--and can disappear according to the laws
of germinal selection--which control the final form of the useless
organ, then those just preceding them, which controlled, let us say,
its size, and thus more and more of the previously active determinants
disappear, and hand in hand with this disappearance there is variation
of all the parts correlated with the dwindling condition of the organ,
so that their own development and that of the animal as a whole suffers
no injury. If it were otherwise, if when a part became useless its
collective determinants were all to disappear at the same time, the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account