Against my position the objection has often been urged that an
arrangement cannot arise or be maintained through natural selection
unless it is _of direct use_ to the individual in which it occurs.
Sexual reproduction cannot therefore have been established simply
because it advances, or even because it makes possible the adaptations
of species, for these adaptations only came about occasionally, perhaps
once in a thousand generations or even less frequently; thus the
intervening generations could derive no advantage of any kind from the
arrangement in question, and therefore, according to the law of the
degeneration of unused characters, it must have long since been lost. I
mentioned this objection before, but was obliged to postpone a detailed
consideration of it until we had discussed germinal selection.
We admit, of course, that characters are only preserved intact as
long as they are of advantage sufficient to turn the scale in favour
of their possessors, and that they begin to fall from their height of
perfection when that is no longer the case; we admit also that new
adaptations are not continually necessary, but are so only at intervals
of long series of generations, and yet the objection cited seems to me
baseless.
Leaving out of account, for the moment, the first introduction of
amphimixis, let us deal with it as an existing occurrence, for the
tenacious persistence of which we wish to find reasons.
Is it really the case that amphimixis is only of importance in
connexion with the new adaptation of a species, and that it has nothing
to do with the persistence of the species in the state of adaptation
already attained? According to the conception of the processes within
the germ-plasm which we have already stated, it is impossible that this
should be the case, for continual slight fluctuations are occurring in
the determinants in consequence of the fluctuations of the nutritive
stream, and these slight variations, plus or minus, do not in many
cases equalize one another or counteract one another by turning again
in a contrary direction; they go on increasing in the direction in
which they have begun. It is only when personal selection opposes them
that they come to a standstill, and this can only happen when they
attain to selection-value, that is to say, when they reach a level at
which they become disadvantageous in the struggle of persons. But as
germinal variations of this kind are continually occurring, personal
selection must keep continual watch over them, and eradicate them as
soon as they have attained selection-value.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account