This is true of most of the Epidendra of South America, and of
_Coryanthus triloba_ of New Zealand, two hundred blossoms of which only
yielded five seed-capsules, and also of our _Ophrys muscifera_ and _O.
aranifera_, the latter of which yielded only a single seed-capsule
from 3,000 flowers gathered in Liguria. We might expect that the
species in question must have become very rare, but this is not always
the case, since each of these capsules contains an enormous number
of seeds, sometimes many thousands. As soon as the visits of insects
cease altogether, the species must die out in the particular locality
concerned, unless it can revert to self-pollination and self-fertility.
There is a whole series of species in which the stigma of the flower
is sensitive to its own pollen, and in many of these an adaptation
to self-fertilization has actually been effected, for the pollinia
detach themselves from their anthers at maturity and fall upon the
stigma. I have already mentioned _Ophrys apifera_, which, according to
Charles Darwin, is no longer visited by insects, although its flowers
still possess the structure required for insect-fertilization. This
species has saved itself from extinction by the normal occurrence of
self-fertilization.
This seems to me noteworthy in two respects. In the first place, it
shows that pure self-fertilization need not necessarily result in a
weakening of the species, and secondly, it affords a clear instance
of a species being transformed in one minute character only, all the
other characters remaining unaltered. In this case it was only the
pollinia that required to vary a little in their mode of attachment and
maturation, in order to effect the transformation of the flower for
self-fertilization, and in point of fact that is all that has varied.
The case is not relevant to our investigation at this moment, but
cases of the kind can so rarely be clearly demonstrated that I cannot
lose the opportunity of calling attention to it. The germ-plasm of
this _Ophrys_ must have varied at an earlier stage, for otherwise the
detachment of the pollinia would not have become normal and hereditary,
but it can only have varied to the extent that the structure of this
one small part of the flower was affected by the variation; something
must have varied in the germ-plasm that had no influence upon the other
parts of the flower, that is, solely the _determinants_ of the pollinia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account