As long as we are so far from an understanding of life no theory of
regeneration can be anything more than a 'portmanteau theory,' as
Delage once expressed himself in relation to the whole theory of
inheritance, a theory which is like a portmanteau in that one can
only take out of it what has previously been put in. If we wish to
explain the renewal of the aboral band of cilia in a Stentor, we
first pack our trunk, in this case the nucleus of the Infusorian,
with the determinants of the ciliated region, and then think of these
as being liberated by the stimulus of wounding, and being brought to
and arranged in the proper place by unknown forces to reconstruct the
ciliary region in some unknown way. No one could be more clearly aware
than I am that this is not an exhaustive causal explanation of the
process itself. Nevertheless, it is not quite without value, inasmuch
as it allows us at least to bring the facts together in rational
order--in this case the dependence of the faculty of regeneration on
the presence of nuclear substance--under a formula which we can use
provisionally, that is, with which we can raise new questions. As soon
as we ascend higher in the series of organisms the theory gains a
greater value, for, while we leave altogether out of account any answer
to the ultimate question, and thus renounce for the present the attempt
to find out how the determinants set to work to call to life the parts
which they control, we are brought face to face with other, in a sense,
preliminary questions which we _can_ solve, and the solution of which
seems to me at least not entirely without value.
The first of these questions runs thus: Is the power of regeneration a
fundamental, primary character of every living being in the sense that
it is present everywhere in equal strength, independently of external
conditions, and thus is an inevitable outcome of the primary characters
of the living substance? Or is it, though primaeval in its beginnings,
a phenomenon of adaptation, which depends on a special mechanism, and
does not occur everywhere in equal extent and potency?
We have already become acquainted with some facts which must incline us
to the latter view. The globular Alga-colonies of _Volvox_ (Fig. 63)
consist of two kinds of cells, of which only one kind, the reproductive
cells, possess the power of reproducing the whole, the others, the
flagellate, or, as we called them, somatic cells, being only able to
produce their like, but never the whole.
New investigations which have been carried out by Dr. Otto Hübner in my
Institute have placed these facts beyond doubt. We may conclude that,
in this case, a disintegration of the germ-plasm has taken place during
ontogeny, by means of differential cell-division, so that only the
reproductive cells receive the complete germ-plasm, while the somatic
cells receive only the determinants necessary to their own specific
differentiation, the somatic determinants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account