We know well enough what forms the main material of thought with bees
and flies, and that is visible objects. For you must think about
_something_ if you think at all; and you can hardly imagine a
contemplative blow-fly setting itself down to reflect, like a Hindu
devotee, on the syllable Om, or on the oneness of existence. Abstract
ideas are not likely to play a large part in apian consciousness. A bee
has a very perfect eye, and with this eye it can see not only form, but
also colour, as Sir John Lubbock's experiments have shown us. The
information which it gets through its eye, coupled with other ideas
derived from touch, smell, and taste, no doubt makes up the main
thinkable and knowable universe as it reveals itself to the apian
intelligence. To ourselves and to bees alike the world is, on the
whole, a coloured picture, with the notions of distance and solidity
thrown in by touch and muscular effort; but sight undoubtedly plays the
first part in forming our total conception of things generally.
What, however, forms the thinkable universe of these little ants
running to and fro so eagerly at my feet? That is a question which used
long to puzzle me in my afternoon walks. The ant has a brain and an
intelligence, but that brain and that intelligence must have been
developed out of _something_. _Ex nihilo nihil fit._ You cannot think
and know if you have nothing to think about. The intelligence of the
bee and the fly was evolved in the course of their flying about and
looking at things: the more they flew, and the more they saw, the more
they knew; and the more brain they got to think with. But the ant does
not generally fly, and, as with most comparatively unlocomotive
animals, its sight is bad. True, the winged males and females have
retained in part the usual sharp eyes of their class--for they are
first cousins to the bees--and they also possess three little eyelets
or _ocelli_, which are wanting to the wingless neuters. Without these
they would never have found one another in their courtship, and they
would have run their heads against the nearest tree, or rushed down the
gaping throat of the first expectant swallow, and so effectually
extinguished their race. Flying animals cannot do without eyes, and
they always possess the most highly developed vision of any living
creatures. But the wingless neuters are almost blind--in some species
quite so; and Sir John Lubbock has shown that their appreciation of
colour is mostly confined to an aversion to red light, and a
comparative endurance of blue. Moreover, they are apparently deaf, and
most of their other senses seem little developed. What can be the raw
material on which that pin's head of a brain sets itself working? For,
small as it is, it is a wonderful organ of intellect; and though Sir
John Lubbock has shown us all too decisively that the originality and
inventive genius of ants have been sadly overrated by Solomon and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account