The Executioner's Knife; Or, Joan of ArcSue, Eugène
General
The Executioner's Knife; Or, Joan of Arc
Sue, Eugène
Biographical fiction; Christian fiction; Christian women saints -- Fiction; Joan, of Arc, Saint, 1412-1431 -- Fiction
BISHOP CAUCHON--"I shall answer your question, and you will see that I
was not to blame. The news of Joan's capture reached us on the morning
of May 25. The very next day, the registrar of Paris, acting under my
orders, addressed in the name and under the seal of the Inquisitor of
France a summons to Monseigneur the Duke of Burgundy, who is the
suzerain of John of Luxembourg, one of whose equerries was the captor of
the Maid. The summons was to the effect that the said Joan be
surrendered to the jurisdiction of the said Inquisitor, to the end that
she may answer, in the words of the good formula 'to the good council,
favor and aid of the good doctors and masters of the University of
Paris.'"
CANON LOYSELEUR--"But, monseigneur, four or five months passed before
the summons of the Inquisitor received an answer. The preliminaries of
the process might have been shortened, and the Maid delivered to the
executioner before this."
BISHOP CAUCHON--"Do you not know that the decisions of the University of
Paris--an ecclesiastical body, that, however, has a hand in
politics--have a powerful influence not only upon the majority of the
higher clergy which upholds the English rule, but also upon the bishops
who have remained faithful to the royalist party? Now, then, did not the
latter, yielding to popular clamor, declare through the medium of the
clerics gathered at Poitiers two years ago for the purpose of
interrogating Joan, that 'she is neither a heretic nor a witch, and
Charles VII may without endangering his salvation, avail himself of the
aid that she brought him'? Very well, then. That opinion found
partisans, even in the bosom of the University of Paris, which is an
enlightened body and little inclined to believe in witches. The
University was at first recalcitrant to my project of itself undertaking
the process of heresy against Joan. It took me a long time, many
negotiations and not a little money, to convince the objectors that from
a political point of view it was of the highest importance to seem to
believe in the witchery of Joan, and thus to deliver her to the flames,
without which her influence would continue to assert itself, despite her
captivity, and that such an influence, disastrous to the English,
beneficent to the French, might, as it came very near doing, make
Charles VII master of Paris. What would then happen? The University
would be shorn of its power, its members would be proscribed and
stripped of their privileges. In order to escape such a danger, it was
imperative to break the instrument that threatened it, in other words,
have Joan burned as a witch. (Laughing) It is a fact, we must always go
back to the fagot. The pyre is our supreme argument."
CANON LOYSELEUR--"And finally, monseigneur, did the University start the
process?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account