The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of EnglandBabbage, Charles
History
The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of England
Babbage, Charles
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England)
In our review of Mr. Weld’s “History of the Royal Society,” [_ante_, p.
621,] we noted that one chapter was devoted to the history of the
celebrated undertaking above named. This chapter is taken from materials
furnished by Mr. Babbage himself, all the documents having undergone the
inspection of Mr. Weld. Of recent publications on the subject it may be
well to note—1. A short account of the transactions with the Government,
communicated by Mr. Babbage to the _Philosophical Magazine_ for
September, 1843. 2. A sketch of the _Analytical Engine_ (on which Mr.
Babbage is now at work, that commenced by the Government being the
_Difference Engine_) written in Italian by Menabrea, and translated,
with notes (and a list of all previous publications), by the Countess of
Lovelace (August 1843). The statements put forward by Mr. Babbage have
thus been in substance before the public for five years, without
contradiction: for though the account (No. 1) was not signed, it was
stated to be _from authority_, allowed to pass as such by the Editors of
the magazine, and generally understood to emanate from Mr. Babbage. We
are then bound to take this first statement as admitted by Government,
more especially after the publication by Mr. Weld, avowedly made from
the documents furnished by Mr. Babbage himself: and assuredly we
understand Mr. Weld as conceiving himself to be distinctly informed by
Mr. Babbage, that _all_ documents of any importance had been
communicated.
The heads of the public history of the _Difference Engine_ are as
follows:—In April, 1823, the Government requested the opinion of the
Royal Society on Mr. Babbage’s plan for “applying machinery to the
purposes of calculating and printing mathematical tables.” The Royal
Society reported favourably, that the machine was “fully adequate to the
objects proposed,”—and this report was laid before Parliament. In July,
Mr. Babbage had an interview with the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Earl
of Ripon) to ascertain if Government would wish him to construct for
_printing_ as well as _calculating_. There is no minute of this
conversation, and the parties have different memories upon it. But soon
after, the Treasury informs the Royal Society that 1,500_l._ was to be
issued to Mr. Babbage “to enable him to bring his invention to
perfection, in the manner recommended.” Mr. Weld remarks that no plan
had been pointed out; but it must be noticed that the original
application was for an opinion upon _calculating and printing_, that the
opinion spoke of the _full adequacy_ of the plan for _the objects
proposed_, and that the final determination of the Government was to
proceed _as recommended_. Unless there were a previous understanding
that all documents should either speak with the verbal completeness of
an indictment or be wholly void, it is clear that the Government
determined to assist Mr. Babbage in realizing the full invention, and
told him so.[49]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account