The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of EnglandBabbage, Charles
History
The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of England
Babbage, Charles
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England)
The work went on for four years, under advances of money from time to
time: the funds were applied by Mr. Babbage, and the accounts were
audited by Messrs. Brunel, Donkin, and Field. We suppose that Government
did not exceed the proposed advance of 1,500_l._; but this is not
expressly stated. In December, 1828, Government applied again to the
Royal Society to report upon the state, progress, and prospects of the
machine. Mr. Babbage at the same time stated that he had expended
6,000_l._—meaning, we suppose, 4,500_l._ over and above the Government
advance. A Committee, consisting of Messrs. Gilbert, Roget, Sabine,
Herschel, Baily, Brunel (the elder), Kater, Donkin, Penn, Rennie,
Barton, Warburton, declined to report on practicability or utility,
considering both as fully established, and reported that, the
difficulties considered, the progress was as great as could be expected,
and that the engine was likely to fulfil the expectations of its
inventor. On this report the Government made further advances, and the
machine was declared national property. But the official payments soon
failed: and Mr. Babbage called a meeting of private friends, in May
1829, who, on the representation that he had then advanced 4,000_l._
himself, in addition to the Government advance of 3,000_l._, advised him
strongly not to proceed without adequate help from the Government. On
this representation, the Duke of Wellington, Mr. Goulburn, and Lord
Ashley inspected what there was to show, and the Treasury advanced
3,000_l._ more. In December 1830, nearly 600_l._ was still due to Mr.
Babbage, “upon the last account,” and that sum to the superintendent,
Mr. Clement. The Treasury gave directions for the advance of 600_l._ to
pay Mr. Clement, and desired a fresh inspection and opinion from the
Royal Society. The Committee above named (with the addition of Sir J.
Lubbock and Mr. Troughton) reported (April 1831) as favourably as before
on every point, and recommended attention to Mr. Babbage’s suggestion
that the workshops should be removed to the neighbourhood of his
residence. With regard to probable expense, they subjoined Mr. Brunel’s
estimate that 8,000_l._ additional would be sufficient; but recommending
that the Government be advised to provide for 12,000_l._ by way of
estimate. A piece of ground adjoining Mr. Babbage’s garden was taken,
and a fire-proof building was erected. When about 17,000_l._ had been
expended altogether, further progress was arrested by the extravagant
demands made by Mr. Clement, as compensation for carrying on the
construction in the new buildings. These were out of the question: and
Mr. Clement withdrew, taking with him all the tools which had been used,
many of which had been invented for the occasion. For it is the law that
engineers and mechanics possess the right of property in all tools they
have constructed, even though the cost of construction may have been
defrayed by their employers. A special agreement ought, the reader will
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account