The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of EnglandBabbage, Charles
History
The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of England
Babbage, Charles
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England)
But, until the statement made by him shall be proved either false or
defective, it must stand that the Government never returned any answer
to the question—Shall the new engine be constructed, or shall the old
one be proceeded with? We are of opinion that they ought to have
required him to proceed with the old one. They ought to have said—The
public can only judge by results: how well satisfied soever men of
science may be that the new machine is immeasurably superior to the old
one, society at large will never comprehend the abandonment of a scheme
on which so much has been expended; they will say—What if, in
constructing No. 2, No. 3 should be discovered, as much superior to No.
2 as No. 2 is to No. 1! And if Mr. Babbage had declined to proceed with
his first project, when thus urged, it is our opinion that he would have
richly deserved a very harsh censure. And of this we are sure, that if
Government had allowed him to finish the first machine, and he had done
so with success, the House of Commons would willingly have granted money
for the second,—aye, and for the third and fourth, if he had invented
them. But the Government itself prevented the matter from coming to any
such issue. It is possible that Sir R. Peel and Mr. Goulburn allowed Mr.
Babbage’s well-known wish[50] to abandon the first plan in favour of the
new one to influence their decision. It may be that they were startled
at finding that 17,000_l._ expended upon one project was only the
precursor of another. If so, we think they put themselves in the wrong
by not fastening on Mr. Babbage the alternative of either proceeding
with the existing construction, or taking the entire responsibility of
refusal upon himself. As the matter now stands, and unless Mr. Babbage
can be refuted, the answer to the question why he did not proceed is,
that during the eight years in which he had to bear the blame of the
delay he could not procure even the attention of the Government, much
less any decision on the course to be taken.
It is generally understood that Mr. Babbage is determined to proceed
with the _Analytical Engine_, gradually, and at his own expense; and
that the drawings are in a state of great forwardness. According to Mr.
Babbage himself, many experiments have been made with the object “on the
one hand, by simplifying the construction as much as possible, and on
the other, by contriving new and cheaper means of execution, ultimately
to reduce the expense within those limits which a private individual may
command.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account