The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of EnglandBabbage, Charles
History
The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of England
Babbage, Charles
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England)
The great principle to be borne in mind is, that, whatever the future
destination of the building, it must be self-supporting. The best and
most certain test of its utility to the public is furnished by the fact
of their being willing to pay for the enjoyments it affords them.
The plan of having a considerable portion of the building devoted to a
winter garden would supply a great want in our wet and uncertain
climate. The temperature ought not to be high, so that exercise might be
taken under shelter. No dogs, horses, or carriages ought to be admitted.
A large portion of those residing in the immediate neighbourhood would
subscribe, and also many who possessed carriages. But the number of
subscribers would depend chiefly on the position chosen for the
building. In its _present_ locality, the prejudices of the wealthier
class would be increased by the injustice of retaining it in violation
of the strongest pledges, and it would probably have a very limited
number of subscribers.
Perhaps it might be desirable to add reading-rooms for newspapers and
for the periodical literature of the day. Subscriptions to these might
be either for limited periods, or even for a single day. A
refreshment-room, also, would be required.
If, however, the building were removed to the situation proposed in the
seventh chapter of this volume, it would be accessible to a much larger
number of subscribers. Its two ends being then placed at a small
distance from the two great thoroughfares passing Hyde Park Corner and
the Marble Arch, a large number of its visitors would arrive by the
omnibuses which pass each of those well-frequented localities.
Space might readily be found either for periodical or permanent
galleries of painting and of sculpture. An objection has been made to
the former, namely, that the light in the glass palace is not fit for
the exhibition of paintings. It is singular that it should not have
occurred to such objectors that this is almost the only building in
which, from its very nature, there exists the most unlimited control
over both the quantity and the direction of light that may be required.
The profit to be derived from this part of the establishment will, as in
the former questions, depend greatly on the situation of the building.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account