The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of EnglandBabbage, Charles
History
The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of England
Babbage, Charles
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England)
“In concluding this long report, I have been uniformly supported by
the _confidence of the government_.”—_Astron. Royal, Rep. June 1844_,
p. 20.
The following extract of a letter from the Astronomer Royal to the late
Sir Robert Peel, shows that his time was so occupied with the labours of
the Railway Gauge Commission, that he was unable to draw up a memorial
which he had himself proposed, even though it related to an astronomical
subject—our colonial observatories.
* * * * “I have been so closely employed on the papers of the Railway
Gauge Commission, that it has been impossible for me to draw up a
memorial before the present time. * * * *
“April 16th, 1846.
To the Right Hon. Sir Robert Peel, Bart., &c.”
“By the giving opinions on subjects of railways and _other mechanical
matters referred to me by Government_, it has appeared that our
energies are not wholly absorbed in the mere Astronomy of the
Observatory.”—_Astron. Royal, Rep. June 1846_, p. 10.
(N.B. The italics do not occur in the original quotations.)
Now it is evident from these extracts from Reports of the Astronomer
Royal to the Board of Visitors and from other facts, that he wishes
himself to be considered the general referee of Government in all
scientific questions.
The office of Astronomer Royal is one of great importance: it requires
the undivided energy and talents of one person, and great as Mr. Airy’s
abilities undoubtedly are, yet it is highly injudicious to divert them
from their legitimate object,—the direction of the many arduous duties
of the establishment over which he presides.
During many years I have frequently found, in my communications with
members of Government on subjects connected with the Calculating
Engines, difficulties on their part which remained entirely
unexplained;—unseen obstacles which were never alluded to, but whose
existence could not be doubted.
Although frequently warned by personal friends that it was unwise to
neglect such machinations as those which I have, at length, been
reluctantly compelled to expose; yet I was unwilling for a long time to
believe that they were directed against myself.
I have now traced the connexion of the Rev. R. Sheepshanks, (who had
avowed his determination “_to discredit me_,” and also to “_attack me on
another subject at a future time_,”) through his friend the Astronomer
Royal, with the Government. According to the Astronomer Royal’s own
statement, he was their adviser on all scientific subjects. The
Government had no other official adviser, and would scarcely have
ventured to decide upon points connected with some of the most profound
questions of mathematics, on their own responsibility.
There are, I am aware, other channels than those of official reports, by
which the Government may have been influenced. I do not, therefore,
expect to find any formal report denying the practical utility of the
Calculating Engines, or the possibility of constructing them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account